Biology

Submitted by Elisa Acosta on August 4th, 2015
Short Description: 

Students interview their professor(s) and ask them to describe how they do research, how research gets disseminated in their discipline, etc. Each student can ask one question below. This assignment can be useful as a “first day of class” activity for a First Year Seminar. Novice researchers are introduced to scholarly discourse and discipline-specific approaches to producing knowledge by experts.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Interview a scholar.docxdisplayed 1470 times16.94 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

• Students will articulate the processes of information creation and dissemination in a particular discipline.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Variations: 1. The writing instructor interviews the content faculty member in front of the class. 2. Interview two of your professors from different disciplines. Compare and contrast their answers. How are the disciplines similar and how are they different? Discuss the differences in the role of publication and scholarly communication across disciplines. Assessment: Students are asked to listen critically and carefully to their professor’s interview and then write a brief reflective essay/journal entry/writing response. Writing prompt: How are questions and new ideas formulated, introduced, and disseminated your professor’s field? Describe the “typical” research process.

Suggested Citation: 
Acosta, Elisa. "Interview a Scholar." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/interview-scholar.

Teaching Resource

Information literacy resources for curriculum development are browsable by discipline, goal, and/or level.

Submitted by Jennifer Masunaga on June 17th, 2015
Short Description: 

This assignment asks students to compare and contrast a Wikipedia article and an article from a subject specific Encyclopedia owned by the library. It asks the students to evaluate each resource by assessing its Relevance, Authority, Date, Accuracy and Rationale. Evaluation using these five criteria is known as the RADAR framework. Although the wikipedia article in this assignment is from biology, it can be switched out for any discipline.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
This is the PDF version of the assignmentdisplayed 20167 times120.62 KB
This is the Word version of the assignment.displayed 893 times20.78 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Learning Objectives: At the end of this assignment, the student should be able to 1. Recognize how Wikipedia and scholarly encyclopedias differ in content, authority and relevance to academia. 2. Learn how to check a Wikipedia article’s quality “grade”. 3. Use the RADAR framework to critically evaluate a background source.

Individual or Group:

Assessment or Criteria for Success
(e.g. rubric, guidelines, exemplary sample paper, etc.): 
AttachmentSize
rubric for wikipedia assignment.pdfdisplayed 1039 times82.3 KB
Suggested Citation: 
Masunaga, Jennifer. "Wikipedia vs. Encyclopedia." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/wikipedia-vs-encyclopedia.

Teaching Resource

Teaching Resource

MERLOT is a curated collection of free and open online teaching, learning, and faculty development services contributed and used by an international education community.

Pages