Health

Teaching Resource

The Teaching Commons brings together high-quality open educational resources from leading colleges and universities.

Teaching Resource

An alphabetic, annotated list of undergraduate research journals that may provide the opportunity for students to use the work of peers and to submit their own work as part of their research programs.

Submitted by Elisa Acosta on August 4th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Students interview their professor(s) and ask them to describe how they do research, how research gets disseminated in their discipline, etc. Each student can ask one question below. This assignment can be useful as a “first day of class” activity for a First Year Seminar. Novice researchers are introduced to scholarly discourse and discipline-specific approaches to producing knowledge by experts.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Interview a scholar.docxdisplayed 1325 times16.94 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

• Students will articulate the processes of information creation and dissemination in a particular discipline.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Variations: 1. The writing instructor interviews the content faculty member in front of the class. 2. Interview two of your professors from different disciplines. Compare and contrast their answers. How are the disciplines similar and how are they different? Discuss the differences in the role of publication and scholarly communication across disciplines. Assessment: Students are asked to listen critically and carefully to their professor’s interview and then write a brief reflective essay/journal entry/writing response. Writing prompt: How are questions and new ideas formulated, introduced, and disseminated your professor’s field? Describe the “typical” research process.

Suggested Citation: 
Acosta, Elisa. "Interview a Scholar." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/interview-scholar.

Teaching Resource

Information literacy resources for curriculum development are browsable by discipline, goal, and/or level.

Submitted by Jennifer Masunaga on June 17th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

The following activity is meant to demonstrate the concepts of authorship and authority to your students. It introduces the idea that context can influence the tone and writing style of a faculty member or scholar and also introduces the concept of the scholarly conversation. It can be used for any discipline.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
This is the PDF version of the assignmentdisplayed 1256 times73.28 KB
This is the Word doc of the assignmentdisplayed 878 times124.07 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

At the end of this activity, students should… • Be able to compare and contrast two different sources in order to comprehend the different types of context for scholarly ideas. • Recognize scholarly blogs and other informal scholarly communication sources in order to describe scholarly communication as an ongoing and evolving dialogue.

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Masunaga, Jennifer. "Authority is Contextual and Constructed: Class Discussion of Authorship." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/authority-contextual-and-constructed-class-discussion-authorship.
Submitted by Jennifer Masunaga on June 17th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This assignment asks students to compare and contrast a Wikipedia article and an article from a subject specific Encyclopedia owned by the library. It asks the students to evaluate each resource by assessing its Relevance, Authority, Date, Accuracy and Rationale. Evaluation using these five criteria is known as the RADAR framework. Although the wikipedia article in this assignment is from biology, it can be switched out for any discipline.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
This is the PDF version of the assignmentdisplayed 19832 times120.62 KB
This is the Word version of the assignment.displayed 772 times20.78 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Learning Objectives: At the end of this assignment, the student should be able to 1. Recognize how Wikipedia and scholarly encyclopedias differ in content, authority and relevance to academia. 2. Learn how to check a Wikipedia article’s quality “grade”. 3. Use the RADAR framework to critically evaluate a background source.

Individual or Group:

Assessment or Criteria for Success
(e.g. rubric, guidelines, exemplary sample paper, etc.): 
AttachmentSize
rubric for wikipedia assignment.pdfdisplayed 772 times82.3 KB
Suggested Citation: 
Masunaga, Jennifer. "Wikipedia vs. Encyclopedia." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/wikipedia-vs-encyclopedia.

Teaching Resource

Teaching Resource

MERLOT is a curated collection of free and open online teaching, learning, and faculty development services contributed and used by an international education community.

Teaching Resource

Jorum is the UK’s largest repository for discovering and sharing Open Educational Resources for higher and further education and the Skills sector.

Pages