Research as Inquiry (Frame 4)

Submitted by Lane Wilkinson on January 6th, 2016
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This activity proceeds via Socratic questioning. The goal is to have students explain the common stumbling blocks they encounter as they look for information and as they write papers (if they have). The role of the librarian is to facilitate the discussion by providing a contextual framework for student experiences. By showing students that their research process follows a common pattern, they can make better choices about how, when, and where to look for information (e.g., not jumping straight to peer-reviewed articles when they can barely define their topic)

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
1-11 Information Needs, Types, Qualities.docxdisplayed 4001 times53.49 KB
AttachmentSize
Optional worksheet displayed 4373 times250.83 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to articulate the type of information they need to complete a given task. Students will be able to identify the appropriate uses for various information formats. Students will be able to explain the criteria by which we identify the credibility of an information source. Students will be able to identify which attributes of a given information source should be included in an annotated bibliography.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This is a frequent activity I developed for our second-semester composition program. The common assignment is an annotated bibliography of 8-12 sources. Analyzing student bibliographies showed that they were having a tough time understanding how format can affect the usefulness of an information source, within context. The most frequent problem involved students jumping straight to peer-reviewed scholarship when they could barely articulate their research question. Likewise, students often do not approach research strategically and with an eye towards collecting a range of sources that will help address many common research needs. Since this activity is coupled to an annotated bibliography, a secondary pay-off is in helping students write their annotations. Once able to articulate the information need a source satisfies, they can better conceptualize how to incorporate the information into their paper.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

This is a Socratic activity, so the librarian has to take the traditional "sage on the stage" approach and has to be comfortable keeping the conversation on track, no matter where it might go. The attached instructions are only a loose framework to help guide discussion.

Suggested Citation: 
Wilkinson, Lane. "Information Needs, Types, and Qualities." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2016. https://projectcora.org/assignment/information-needs-types-and-qualities.
Submitted by Lindsey McLean on January 5th, 2016
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This assignment was designed to incorporate information literacy concepts into an in depth writing assignment. By only focusing on a total of one outside source at a time, students are required to do deep research to find the one source that they can engage with on the level required for a good essay. Requiring a small number of sources also allows the students to practice incorporating outside material into their own writing and thinking and allows the instructor to see progress in this area.

Exercise One:

Choose a phenomenon, situation, or event that relates to family life in the United States. Examples of this could be gay marriage, international adoption, divorce, immigration, or a phenomenon that has directly impacted your own family. Find one scholarly source written by a sociologist related to your topic and write a 1200 word essay (+/- 10%) that describes the phenomenon as you understand it, identifies how it is connected to family life in the United States, why you are interested in it, the ideas presented by the author of the source, and how those ideas add to your knowledge or understanding of the phenomenon. Cite your source properly in text using ASA style and include a full ASA citation for it at the end or your paper.

Exercise Two:

Find a second scholarly source written by a sociologist on the phenomena you selected. Write a 600 (+/- 10%) word addendum to your original essay that details the ideas presented by the second scholar and how these ideas further enhance or complicate your understanding of the phenomena. Cite your sources properly in text using ASA style and include a full ASA citation for your sources at the end or your paper.

Library Instruction:This exercise would benefit from a library instruction session focused on the first learning outcome – identifying scholarly sources and finding discipline specific information

  • Discussion of identifying scholarly sources (ending with the three-point test for scholarly information: peer-reviewed or extensively edited, included citations, written by a scholar from within the discipline)
  • Finding scholarly sources using discipline specific tools (for sociology: Sociological Abstracts, Social Science Citation Index)
Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Writing, Analysis, and Disciplinary Discourse Learning Sequence - McLean.docxdisplayed 955 times18.5 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  1. Students will be able to identify and find scholarly sources within a specific discipline.
  2. Students will be able to thoughtfully and ethically integrate discipline specific scholarly sources into their writing.

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
McLean, Lindsey. "Writing, Analysis, and Disciplinary Discourse." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2016. https://projectcora.org/assignment/writing-analysis-and-disciplinary-discourse.
Submitted by Desirae Zingarelli-Sweet on December 1st, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This set of assignments is designed to help students: (a) grow initial thoughts and questions into carefully scoped and well-reasoned research papers, and (b) develop critical thinking skills through interrogation of familiar images of religion and spirituality in American popular culture.

Learning Outcomes: 

a) Critically evaluate images of religion in American popular culture (primary sources), using criteria such as date, authorship, context, and rationale for creation and/or dissemination. b) Formulate an appropriately scoped research question based on information gaps or on reexamination of existing information. c) Locate and access pertinent scholarly sources beyond course readings. d) Analyze specific aspects of a religious tradition as historical, social, and cultural phenomena through integration of course content and outside scholarly sources. e) Demonstrate an understanding of the value of information and nature of the scholarly conversation through the consistent and accurate citation of sources in Chicago style. f) Interpret chosen images (primary sources), course material, and other secondary sources in order to draw reasonable conclusions about the transformation of religious concepts through their circulation in American popular culture.

Discipline: 
Theology

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Zingarelli-Sweet, Desirae. "Sequenced Research Paper in Religious Studies." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/sequenced-research-paper-religious-studies.
Submitted by Susan Archambault on August 6th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This assignment is designed to help students develop a thoughtful research topic. Students go through a series of steps, questions, and background reading to help them better understand and refine a research topic.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
DevelopingResearchTopic_socialjustice_FINAL.pdfdisplayed 4582 times263.92 KB
DevelopingResearchTopic_socialjustice_FINAL.docxdisplayed 1960 times297.42 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • Conceptualize and refine an effective research topic
  • Value information and sources from different perspectives
  • Contextualize a research topic by drawing upon their own intellectual curiosity or personal experience

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This exercise is due week 3, usually before library instruction. As a result, the library created a 4-minute instruction video done as a pre-visit homework assignment called "Developing a Topic with CQ Researcher and Opposing Viewpoints" available on this LibGuide: http://libguides.lmu.edu/RHET1000/LibraryVisit

Using a Topic Development exercise, students will explore and conduct preliminary research on three separate research topics. This is in conjunction with the Information Literacy component of the course as stated in "Rhetorical Arts: Speaking and Writing for Social Justice" common syllabus. A requirement for all first-year students, Rhetorical Arts is a course designed specifically to integrate important skills- information literacy, writing, and public speaking- into the Jesuit Rhetorical Tradition "Eloquentia Perfecta." Students will also engage with important ethical themes related to the common good. 

This is the first assignment in a sequence of writing and oral assignments (followed by a Research Proposal, Annotated Bibliography, Persuasive Research Paper, etc.). Each successive assignment expands on the previous assignments.

Assessment or Criteria for Success
(e.g. rubric, guidelines, exemplary sample paper, etc.): 
AttachmentSize
Rubric for Research Exploration.docxdisplayed 1226 times22.71 KB
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Some students may think this is busy work. Don't allow students to turn this in at the end of the semester with their final paper, as this defeats the purpose of sequencing assignments.

Suggested Citation: 
Archambault, Susan. "Research Exploration Exercise." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/research-exploration-exercise.
Submitted by Dean Scheibel on June 10th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Students are asked to reflect on their experience writing a required “literature review” for the course through a first-person “comic.” The visual narrative format allows students to come to terms with their own experience of what was hard, easy, or confusing about the literature review process and express it in a creative way.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
assignmentCMST 204 COMIX CRITERIA.docxdisplayed 815 times23.34 KB
AttachmentSize
Activitiesdisplayed 682 times21.91 KB
Tipsdisplayed 636 times23.8 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

To reflect on the process of writing and executing a thorough Review of the Literature on a topic within the field of Communication Studies

Individual or Group:

Assessment or Criteria for Success
(e.g. rubric, guidelines, exemplary sample paper, etc.): 
AttachmentSize
CMST 204 RUBRIC FOR COMIC REFLECTION.docxdisplayed 728 times22.18 KB
Suggested Citation: 
Scheibel, Dean. "Using Comics to Reflect on Academic Work." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/using-comics-reflect-academic-work.
Submitted by Susan Archambault on June 9th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Students pick a topic related to Communication Studies (or another social science discipline) and then define the topic operationally by finding a way to measure it. They test out their instrument on a partner.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
operationalize-exercise.docxdisplayed 1105 times22.88 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • To prepare the student to assess the appropriateness of various research methods in response to questions asked by communication researchers
  • To build general knowledge of both quantitative and qualitative research methods and objectives

Individual or Group:

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

SDSU Test Finder for Books

SDSU Test Finder for Journal Articles

Suggested Citation: 
Archambault, Susan. "Measure a Concept." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/measure-concept.
Submitted by Lindsey McLean on May 8th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

The primary purpose of a literature review is to provide a rationale for your proposed research question(s). You need to locate your research question within the broader conversation of a particular discipline. A review of literature should present a synthesis of existing theory and research literature that argues for the usefulness of the research question. The process of constructing a literature review acquaints the researcher with the studies already done in a particular area and allows the researcher to build/extend existing knowledge and enter into the discourse of a particular field. The student selects a research topic that is related to course material and of interest and gets it approved by the instructor. Then they must locate 8-10 scholarly sources that address the research topic. Finally, they write a literature review that includes a clear introduction stating the research topic; and a body that summarizes and synthesizes the 8-10 sources required, ending with a new research question. All sources must be cited in proper APA style. Grading is based on source quality and source relationship to the research topic, organization, ability to synthesize, quality of the research question, and adherence to the proper citation style.

AttachmentSize
Matrices-Worksheet.pdfdisplayed 9575 times186.4 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • Construct a well-supported research-based question
  • Find and use scholarly and discipline-specific professional information
  • Select an appropriate documentation style and use it consistently to cite sources
  • Evaluate scholarly articles and understand the research method used
Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This assignment works well when paired with an earlier annotated bibliography assignment.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

The library’s subject LibGuides (research guides) available at http://libguides.lmu.edu and the ARC’s Writing LibGuide available at http://libguides.lmu.edu/writing.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Students lean towards summarizing rather than synthesizing.

Suggested Citation: 
McLean, Lindsey. "Literature Review." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/literature-review.

Pages