High School / Secondary

Assignments specifically geared toward grades 9-12.

Submitted by Hillary Richardson on April 21st, 2021
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This assignment was created to help undergraduate students use research articles to help inform their argument about a "text."  This exercise has been used in library instruction sessions for art history, composition, english literature, women's studies, and history classes. After reflecting on what they know about a text (or image or multimedia), brainstorming search terms, and tracking relevant patterns in search results, students can synthesize information from a variety of sources in an organized, methodological fashion. 

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Research Matrix Exercise.pptxdisplayed 1322 times111.33 KB
Research Matrix_handout.docxdisplayed 1140 times369.2 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to brainstorm and refine research topics by brainstorming search terms, identifying relevant resources, and charting related topics

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This lesson was originally created to assist with organizing ideas and sources for a literature review, but was edited to simplify objectives and condense the lesson for shorter assignments 

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

See attached files

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

This can be done for individual students or in small groups. In addition to sending this document directly to students (either as a file or in a printed handout), create separate Google docs (or some other interactive document platform) for them to work in together. 

Suggested Citation: 
Richardson, Hillary. "Research matrix: synthesizing search results." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/research-matrix-synthesizing-search-results.
Submitted by Lydia Bello on March 31st, 2021
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

During this activity, students work with their lab partners to apply Mike Caulfield’s “Four Moves and a Habit” to a piece of science information they have found on the open web.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Lesson Plan displayed 1280 times229.33 KB
Pre-lab Canvas Quiz questions developed by Andrea Verdan, Seattle University Chemistry displayed 1397 times99.7 KB
In Class Activity Templatedisplayed 1265 times55.69 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • Upon completing this activity, students will
    • Identify strategies to evaluate scientific information or media on the web in an efficient manner
    • Understand the characteristics that differentiate scholarly versus popular literature

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

I use this activity every year in the lab section of General chemistry. At this level of chemistry students are rarely doing research work that involves chemistry literature, and don’t necessarily have chemistry research questions or a need for understanding the library research databases for for the class. However, students at this level are engaging with science information in the classroom and outside the classroom, and this is a great opportunity to build skills needed to engage with information in online spaces. 

Since I developed this assignment, Mike Caulfield has developed a new framework based on the Four Moves, called SIFT. At this point I’ve stayed with Four Moves and a Habit because it comes with an open textbook that I can assign pre-class reading from, and because the named concept of lateral reading has been useful for students.

Many thanks to Andrea Verdan, Seattle University Chemistry, for her work on developing this lesson plan and developing the pre-lab quiz questions.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

I’ve included a lesson plan, word document of the in-class activity, and copy of quiz questions used in Canvas as a pre-lab quiz. The lesson plan does not include much of the language I use to describe the concepts. If you want to know how I frame my explanations, please don’t hesitate to ask! 

Assessment or Criteria for Success
Assessment Short Description: 
There is no assessment criteria for this assignment, other than completion.
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

THe most successful way to teach these moves is to demonstrate them live, with all the risks that may entail. It is useful to identify one or two examples that you can use to practice the different moves. During the activity it is useful to keep an eye on the collaborative document (Google Doc) students are working on, and use it to check in with individual groups. 

Suggested Citation: 
Bello, Lydia. "“Four Moves and a Habit” in General Chemistry Lab ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/%E2%80%9Cfour-moves-and-habit%E2%80%9D-general-chemistry-lab-0.
Submitted by Lydia Bello on March 31st, 2021
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

During this activity, students work with their lab partners to apply Mike Caulfield’s “Four Moves and a Habit” to a piece of science information they have found on the open web.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Lesson Plan displayed 1280 times229.33 KB
Pre-lab Canvas Quiz questions developed by Andrea Verdan, Seattle University Chemistry displayed 1397 times99.7 KB
In Class Activity Templatedisplayed 1265 times55.69 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • Upon completing this activity, students will
    • Identify strategies to evaluate scientific information or media on the web in an efficient manner
    • Understand the characteristics that differentiate scholarly versus popular literature

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

I use this activity every year in the lab section of General chemistry. At this level of chemistry students are rarely doing research work that involves chemistry literature, and don’t necessarily have chemistry research questions or a need for understanding the library research databases for for the class. However, students at this level are engaging with science information in the classroom and outside the classroom, and this is a great opportunity to build skills needed to engage with information in online spaces. 

Since I developed this assignment, Mike Caulfield has developed a new framework based on the Four Moves, called SIFT. At this point I’ve stayed with Four Moves and a Habit because it comes with an open textbook that I can assign pre-class reading from, and because the named concept of lateral reading has been useful for students.

Many thanks to Andrea Verdan, Seattle University Chemistry, for her work on developing this lesson plan and developing the pre-lab quiz questions.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

I’ve included a lesson plan, word document of the in-class activity, and copy of quiz questions used in Canvas as a pre-lab quiz. The lesson plan does not include much of the language I use to describe the concepts. If you want to know how I frame my explanations, please don’t hesitate to ask! 

Assessment or Criteria for Success
Assessment Short Description: 
There is no assessment criteria for this assignment, other than completion.
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

THe most successful way to teach these moves is to demonstrate them live, with all the risks that may entail. It is useful to identify one or two examples that you can use to practice the different moves. During the activity it is useful to keep an eye on the collaborative document (Google Doc) students are working on, and use it to check in with individual groups. 

Suggested Citation: 
Bello, Lydia. "“Four Moves and a Habit” in General Chemistry Lab ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/%E2%80%9Cfour-moves-and-habit%E2%80%9D-general-chemistry-lab.
Submitted by Jennifer Masunaga on February 15th, 2021
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This is a lateral reading 75 minute long lesson plan and worksheet assignment that introduces online source evaluation to undergraduate students, preferably first years. Lateral reading involves researching the content of a source as one reads it and this technique is popular with online fact checkers and journalists.  The lesson plan calls for instructors to demonstrate lateral reading live (or via recording if asynchronous) using resources found on Google.  It then asks students to repeat the steps using the worksheet as guide with research topics of their choice (they also search using Google). There is a reflection piece that the end that asks students to consider if they would recommend the sources they evaluate to the community at large.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Lesson Plandisplayed 1115 times25.85 KB
Worksheetdisplayed 1878 times182.74 KB
Bbiliography and Further Reading Listdisplayed 630 times16.09 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Use lateral reading to identify potential biases or controversies associated with an organization publishing online sources.

Identify the type and appropriateness of sources used to make claims.

Defend a position on whether your source should be included or excluded from a bibliography for future Cal State LA students, citing at least three reasons.

Reflect on your role as a reader including your personal relationship with the information.

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Masunaga, Jennifer. "Evaluating Online Sources with Lateral Reading." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/evaluating-online-sources-lateral-reading.
Submitted by Keely Kiczenski on December 10th, 2020
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This lesson is intended as a one hour, single-session overview of one aspect of information literacy: evaluating the trustworthiness of resources, particularly online. The lesson is designed for a group of 10-25 adults in a public or academic library, or is also suitable for high school students. Instructor will teach students how to investigate a source and apply three small but powerful information literacy tools to evaluation: SIFT, PIE, and SMELL.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Information Literacy Lesson Plan with Appendix.pdfdisplayed 3471 times263.93 KB
IL Lesson Plan Appendix (separate).pdfdisplayed 2126 times163.28 KB
Information Literacy Lesson Plan.docxdisplayed 1043 times56.03 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • The student will be able to distinguish between standard evaluative criteria and apply appropriate criteria to an information source to determine its quality and relevance. 
  • The student will be able to detect misinformation and defend the credibility of a source by using relevant evaluative criteria and verifying claims externally.
  • Students will be able to locate a variety of sources about a topic and discern which would be most useful in fulfilling their information need.

 

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 
Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Suggested Citation: 
Kiczenski, Keely. "Who Can I Trust? – Questions to Ask When Evaluating Information Sources (featuring SIFT, PIE, and SMELL methods)." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://projectcora.org/assignment/who-can-i-trust-%E2%80%93-questions-ask-when-evaluating-information-sources-featuring-sift-pie.
Submitted by Justin de la Cruz on October 22nd, 2020
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Background information, assignment, and reflection on analyzing popular information.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Verifying Popular Information.pdfdisplayed 1005 times76.51 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will learn how to analyze popular information.

Students will reflect on how they receive and share information.

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 
Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Suggested Citation: 
de la Cruz, Justin. "Verifying Popular Information." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://projectcora.org/assignment/verifying-popular-information.
Submitted by Justin de la Cruz on October 22nd, 2020
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Background information, assignment, and reflection on analyzing information received from the news.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Verifying Information in the News.pdfdisplayed 1061 times78.14 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
Students will learn how to analyze the information they receive from the news.
Students will reflect on how they receive and share information.

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 
Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Suggested Citation: 
de la Cruz, Justin. "Verifying Information in the News." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://projectcora.org/assignment/verifying-information-news.
Submitted by Kelleen Maluski on October 21st, 2020
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This video was put together to offer health sciences students a brief introduction to critically thinking about their resources in order to evaluate how appropriate they are for use in their work. It was important that the learners understand the complexities of using specific resources and why it is important to always critically evaluate materials. This includes a discussion of critiques of gatekeeping surrounding peer review, how damaging and discriminatory research can still get published, and how to ask crucial questions to subvert dominant narratives. The video primarily points to our research guide, which is linked below as well, in order to help plant the seeds of this conversation without overwhelming learners in the moment. You will find all materials for creation of the video as well as the closed caption script and the video itself here so that you can adapt it to your needs.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
cc.docxdisplayed 732 times12.67 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • Understand how important it is to critically evaluate resources
  • Begin to question the standard and dominant narratives of research and publication practices, such as peer review
  • Know where to get further information and help
Suggested Citation: 
Maluski, Kelleen. "Intro to Evaluating Resources." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://projectcora.org/assignment/intro-evaluating-resources.
Submitted by Zoeanna Mayhook on April 21st, 2020
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Quiz your students on library terminology and concepts using this Library Jeopardy! template. This activity can be done for in-person library instruction sessions, or via Zoom/live virtual instruction sessions.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Library Jeopardy.pptxdisplayed 1456 times1.78 MB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to review library terminology and quiz their knowledge.

 

Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Jeopardy board options are hyperlinked to different question slides. Participants can break up into teams, or be quizzed invidually. Instructors can use buzzers, or students can raise their hand or type their responses into a chat box (during virtual sessions).

Suggested Citation: 
Mayhook, Zoeanna. "Library Jeopardy! Template ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://projectcora.org/assignment/library-jeopardy-template.
Submitted by Aisha Conner-Gaten on March 4th, 2020
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Using three example excerpts on citation practice and the experiences of specific scholars, attendees will interrogate and discuss how whiteness and other oppressions impact citation practice using a series of questions. 

AttachmentSize
Example Excerpt 1 on Misogynoirdisplayed 1049 times63.08 KB
Example Excerpt 2 on Peer Review for Indigenous Scholarsdisplayed 1015 times63.16 KB
Example Excerpt 3 on Citing Problematic Scholarsdisplayed 865 times63.25 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

By Example Number
Example 1:

  • Attendees will identify definitions of erasure and punitive and opportunistic plagiarism 
  • Attendees will reflect on oppression as perpetrated through traditional, textual citation practice

Example 2:

  • Attendees will examine the ways in which indigenous scholars navigate peer review
  • Attendees will reflect on oppression as perpetrated through traditional, textual citation practice

Example 3:

  • Attendees will examine the pros and cons of citing problematic scholars
  • Attendees will develop a strategy for citing problematic scholars bolstered by their personal ethics
  • Attendees will reflect on oppression as perpetrated through traditional, textual citaiton practice

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This activity was done during a citation panel event: https://cal.lmu.edu/event/citations2020#.XmA4O5NKhTY. This was 25 minutes (15 minutes to read and discuss in pairs and 10 minutes to share with the larger group). Discussion was facilitated.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

When facilitating larger discussion, provide summary of each reading as some groups may need context. Review each questions so attendees can share notes taken. Save last question of each example for a shared discussion (each example has same last question).

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Conner-Gaten, Aisha. "Politics of Citation Discussion Activity." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://projectcora.org/assignment/politics-citation-discussion-activity.

Pages