Uses Information (ACRL 4, SCONUL 7, ANZIL 5, ANCIL 8&9)

Submitted by Desirae Zingarelli-Sweet on December 1st, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This set of assignments is designed to help students: (a) grow initial thoughts and questions into carefully scoped and well-reasoned research papers, and (b) develop critical thinking skills through interrogation of familiar images of religion and spirituality in American popular culture.

Learning Outcomes: 

a) Critically evaluate images of religion in American popular culture (primary sources), using criteria such as date, authorship, context, and rationale for creation and/or dissemination. b) Formulate an appropriately scoped research question based on information gaps or on reexamination of existing information. c) Locate and access pertinent scholarly sources beyond course readings. d) Analyze specific aspects of a religious tradition as historical, social, and cultural phenomena through integration of course content and outside scholarly sources. e) Demonstrate an understanding of the value of information and nature of the scholarly conversation through the consistent and accurate citation of sources in Chicago style. f) Interpret chosen images (primary sources), course material, and other secondary sources in order to draw reasonable conclusions about the transformation of religious concepts through their circulation in American popular culture.

Discipline: 
Theology

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Zingarelli-Sweet, Desirae. "Sequenced Research Paper in Religious Studies." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/sequenced-research-paper-religious-studies.
Submitted by Susan Archambault on August 5th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

A 10-minute presentation accompanied by a 20-page research paper. The presentation features highlights from your extensive research on a career field, including a profile of a specific company or organization and an interview with a practicing professional.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Research-A-Career.docxdisplayed 1023 times13.7 KB
AttachmentSize
research-plan.docxdisplayed 908 times23.5 KB
Tips-presentation.docxdisplayed 913 times12.53 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  1. To gain research experience useful for career and job selection
  2. To develop interviewing skills and business writing skills
  3. To develop global and multicultural perspectives within the career of choice

Individual or Group:

Tags:

Suggested Citation: 
Archambault, Susan. "Career Research Portfolio ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/career-research-portfolio.
Submitted by Jennifer Masunaga on July 14th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This assignment is meant to illustrate the differences between scholarly and popular information sources by presenting students with information on the topic of "fracking" from four different resources: a scholarly article, a magazine, a newspaper and a website. It introduces the idea that information can be presented in different formats depending on the context and information need.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Source_Evaluation.docxdisplayed 2183 times20.32 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

At the end of this activity, students should… • Be able to compare and contrast four different types of information sources • Recognize differences between scholarly and non-scholarly articles. • Recognize the importance of authorship

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Masunaga, Jennifer. "Scholarly vs. Popular ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/scholarly-vs-popular.
Submitted by Jennifer Masunaga on June 17th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This assignment asks students to compare and contrast a Wikipedia article and an article from a subject specific Encyclopedia owned by the library. It asks the students to evaluate each resource by assessing its Relevance, Authority, Date, Accuracy and Rationale. Evaluation using these five criteria is known as the RADAR framework. Although the wikipedia article in this assignment is from biology, it can be switched out for any discipline.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
This is the PDF version of the assignmentdisplayed 19832 times120.62 KB
This is the Word version of the assignment.displayed 772 times20.78 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Learning Objectives: At the end of this assignment, the student should be able to 1. Recognize how Wikipedia and scholarly encyclopedias differ in content, authority and relevance to academia. 2. Learn how to check a Wikipedia article’s quality “grade”. 3. Use the RADAR framework to critically evaluate a background source.

Individual or Group:

Assessment or Criteria for Success
(e.g. rubric, guidelines, exemplary sample paper, etc.): 
AttachmentSize
rubric for wikipedia assignment.pdfdisplayed 772 times82.3 KB
Suggested Citation: 
Masunaga, Jennifer. "Wikipedia vs. Encyclopedia." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/wikipedia-vs-encyclopedia.
Submitted by Susan Archambault on June 9th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Students pick a topic related to Communication Studies (or another social science discipline) and then define the topic operationally by finding a way to measure it. They test out their instrument on a partner.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
operationalize-exercise.docxdisplayed 1116 times22.88 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • To prepare the student to assess the appropriateness of various research methods in response to questions asked by communication researchers
  • To build general knowledge of both quantitative and qualitative research methods and objectives

Individual or Group:

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

SDSU Test Finder for Books

SDSU Test Finder for Journal Articles

Suggested Citation: 
Archambault, Susan. "Measure a Concept." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/measure-concept.
Submitted by Lindsey McLean on May 8th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

The primary purpose of a literature review is to provide a rationale for your proposed research question(s). You need to locate your research question within the broader conversation of a particular discipline. A review of literature should present a synthesis of existing theory and research literature that argues for the usefulness of the research question. The process of constructing a literature review acquaints the researcher with the studies already done in a particular area and allows the researcher to build/extend existing knowledge and enter into the discourse of a particular field. The student selects a research topic that is related to course material and of interest and gets it approved by the instructor. Then they must locate 8-10 scholarly sources that address the research topic. Finally, they write a literature review that includes a clear introduction stating the research topic; and a body that summarizes and synthesizes the 8-10 sources required, ending with a new research question. All sources must be cited in proper APA style. Grading is based on source quality and source relationship to the research topic, organization, ability to synthesize, quality of the research question, and adherence to the proper citation style.

AttachmentSize
Matrices-Worksheet.pdfdisplayed 9595 times186.4 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • Construct a well-supported research-based question
  • Find and use scholarly and discipline-specific professional information
  • Select an appropriate documentation style and use it consistently to cite sources
  • Evaluate scholarly articles and understand the research method used
Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This assignment works well when paired with an earlier annotated bibliography assignment.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

The library’s subject LibGuides (research guides) available at http://libguides.lmu.edu and the ARC’s Writing LibGuide available at http://libguides.lmu.edu/writing.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Students lean towards summarizing rather than synthesizing.

Suggested Citation: 
McLean, Lindsey. "Literature Review." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/literature-review.

Pages