Skip to main content


Lesson Plan March 22, 2017

Gallery Walk: What Shapes Information?

Short Description

A gallery walk is a silent, interactive exercise followed by small- or whole-group discussion. You can use this exercise to introduce students to new material, to review previously-introduced material, or to assess teaching and/or learning.

Learning Outcomes

Long-term outcome: Begin to develop a critical understanding of the information environment. Supporting outcomes: I can describe peer-reviewed sources in terms of both the review process and the scholarly conversation. I can identify peer review's affordances and limitations. I can reflect on whose/which voices are not represented within the community of scholars.

Discipline

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips

Space is key for a successful gallery walk! If your classroom is too small or if you don't have enough wall space, consider using a quiet hallway. I've found that I get better student response when I use more visual poster content. Big blocks of text create traffic jams and put unnecessary pressure on students to read and comprehend text quickly and in front of their peers.

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated):

This exercise was implemented in a first-year seminar course after the 20 students had engaged in activities and discussion about the information cycle and scholarly sources (peer review, scholarly conversation, "the literature"). It was followed by a unit on "information privilege" and finally by a group research project.

Suggested Citation

Schlesselman-Tarango, Gina. "Gallery Walk: What Shapes Information?" CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments). 2017. https://projectcora.org/lesson/gallery-walk-what-shapes-information

Adapters

I adapted this activity for a 100 minute first-year composition session. I had previously worked with the class for a session on evaluating news articles and fact-checking claims, but we hadn't talked much about scholarly, peer-reviewed articles. I chose several new examples appropriate for an introductory audience, such as a diagram of the steps in the peer-review process, examples of reviewer comments, and a pay-walled article. The reflections and comments students made on the posters were really insightful, and in their post-session assessment a few students mentioned they better understood peer-review. I would definitely do this activity again. I find it really hard to elaborate on discussions of "what is peer-review" aside from standard definitions and limiters, so I found a lot of value in being able to look at and discuss examples that contextualize the process and show its limitations and biases, such as access, racism and sexism. You can find the full lesson plan, examples, and photos from there gallery walk here: https://goo.gl/ssyMvf.