Information Has Value (Frame 3)

Submitted by Elisa Acosta on May 15th, 2026
Short Description: 

This self-guided, active learning exercise for Zotero was originally created for a 1–1.5 hour standalone online workshop. Zotero is a free, open-source tool that helps users collect, organize, annotate, cite, and share references. It is easy enough for students to learn quickly, yet powerful enough to support dissertations, theses, and capstone projects. Zotero also provides a practical way to engage with the conceptual goals of the ACRL Framework, transforming abstract ideas such as “giving credit” and “joining a scholarly conversation” into concrete research practices.

The lesson plan focuses on importing sources related to “food insecurity” and “college students” into Zotero, correcting citation metadata, creating a quick bibliography, and generating a formatted bibliography in Microsoft Word using Zotero’s Word add-in. Students are provided with step-by-step instructions and supporting resources throughout each stage of the activity.

The exercise includes the following components:

  • Part 1: Practice Importing to Zotero.
  • Part 2: Practice: Correcting the Metadata.
  • Part 3: Creating a Quick Bibliography in Zotero.
  • Part 4: Citing and Creating a Bibliography in Word.

A sample research paper for Part 4 is available in both Microsoft Word and Google Docs formats.

Answer keys are provided in APA style.

A 15-minute instructional video covering Parts 1–3 is currently available. A second video covering Part 4 is in development.

Learning Outcomes: 
  1. Students will import citations from library databases and websites into a Zotero folder.
  2. Students will generate a bibliography in a specific citation style using Zotero.
  3. Students will create in-text citations using Microsoft Word integration feature.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Option 1 (Original format):
The first standalone online workshop was offered in 2022. An optional drop-in help session for Zotero installation was held at 4:00 p.m., followed by the workshop at 4:30 p.m. Students registered via Zoom and received access to the self-guided active learning exercise in advance. The session was delivered synchronously, with pauses after Parts 2, 3, and 4 for guided student practice. The workshop lasted approximately 1.5 hours.

Option 2 (Asynchronous implementation):

The Summer Undergraduate Research Program (SURP) requested an asynchronous version of the workshop. The self-guided exercise was embedded in a LibGuide and integrated into a Blackboard (LMS) course.

Option 3 (Hybrid delivery):

The workshop was split into two one-hour sessions. The first session was an online presentation, followed by a second, in-person session in the library classroom. Students brought laptops for hands-on practice, and librarians provided installation support and Zotero troubleshooting during the in-person session.

Option 4 (Current version):

The current model is a one-hour standalone online workshop. Librarians demonstrate Zotero with brief pauses for questions rather than in-session practice activities. Students may complete the active learning exercise independently after the session or remain in the Zoom room to begin working. A second librarian provides Zotero installation support and troubleshooting in a breakout room. The optional installation help session now occurs after the workshop rather than before. This structure has improved flow, and students report preferring to see the full demonstration before deciding whether to adopt Zotero.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Zotero LibGuide https://libguides.lmu.edu/zotero/workshop

Create a Zotero account https://www.zotero.org/

We now demonstrate ZoteroBib https://zbib.org/   (Education students, K-12 teachers, and parents like it)

Assessment or Criteria for Success
Assessment Short Description: 
Students use the answer key for self-assessment by comparing their completed bibliography to the provided example. This process reinforces the importance of accurate metadata correction. Note: Asynchronous participants complete Parts 1–3. Part 4 is optional until a corresponding instructional video is available.
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

This workshop format is most effective with two librarians, one to lead instruction and one to monitor Zoom chat and respond to questions. After the session, one librarian remains in the main room while the other provides Zotero installation troubleshooting in a breakout room. (Sometimes more liaison librarians attend for additional graduate student support)

While attendees are encouraged to install Zotero prior to the workshop, installation issues are common. Offering technical support after the presentation, rather than before, has proven to be more effective.

All instructional materials currently use APA style. In the future we would like to offer the self-guided active learning exercise in both MLA Style and Chicago Style.

Updates to both Zotero and the library’s discovery tool have required revisions to instructional materials.

Online workshops consistently attract higher attendance than in-person sessions. Participants often include undergraduate students, graduate students, faculty, and staff. Workshops are typically scheduled between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., most often on Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday evenings.

Suggested Citation: 
Acosta, Elisa. "Citations in the Wild: Wrangling Your Citations with Zotero." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2026. https://projectcora.org/assignment/citations-wild-wrangling-your-citations-zotero.
Submitted by Ariel Dyer on November 18th, 2024
Short Description: 

Play-based learning activity asking students to intentionally create "fake news" and engage with their emotional reactions in coming across information. 

Learning Outcomes: 
  • Evaluate news using the SIFT rubric
  • Select relevant misinformation tools and apply to misleading information
  • Create misinformation in order to understand its proliferation

Individual or Group:

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Recommendations for adaptation:

  • -Prior introduction to AI tools
  • -Stronger parameters for discussion post (set the scene)
Suggested Citation: 
Dyer, Ariel. "Faking Breaking News." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2024. https://projectcora.org/assignment/faking-breaking-news.
Submitted by Alessandra Otero-Ramos on January 26th, 2024
Short Description: 

This library class was designed for the courses Scene Design and Technical Theatre. However, it can be adapted and used for courses that make use of digital archives and other types of digital objects to support their arguments.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Visual Research Lesson Plan_SUNY Geneseo_Otero .pdfdisplayed 1200 times62.06 KB
Visual Research_Scene Design_Worksheet.pdfdisplayed 1003 times251.12 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • By the end of this class, 
    • (1) Students will be able to find reliable and high-quality images of their chosen topic. 
    • (2) Students will be able to critically evaluate the images for their visual research assignment. 

Individual or Group:

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

I taught this class for THEA 342: Scene Design. The students were asked to work on a visual research project consisting of a presentation based on their chosen architectural style (e.g. art deco, gothic) and its history. Following the presentation the students builded a model making project based on the visual research done for it. 

Suggested Citation: 
Otero-Ramos, Alessandra. "Pictorial Research: Finding and Choosing the Best Images for Your Project ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2024. https://projectcora.org/assignment/pictorial-research-finding-and-choosing-best-images-your-project.
Submitted by Sarah Hartman-Caverly on December 20th, 2023
Short Description: 

The Hidden Layer Workshop introduces key generative AI (genAI) concepts through a privacy lens. Participants probe the possibilities and limitations of genAI while considering implications for intellectual privacy, intellectual property, data sovereignty, and human agency. In the centerpiece activity, participants engage in a hidden layer simulation to develop a conceptual understanding of the algorithms in the neural networks underlying LLMs and their implications for machine bias and AI hallucination. Drawing on Richards’s theory of intellectual privacy (2015) and the movement for data sovereignty, and introducing an original framework for the ethical evaluation of AI, Hidden Layer prepares participants to be critical users of genAI and synthetic media.

The workshop is designed for a 60-minute session, but can be extended to fill the time available.
Includes workshop guide, presentation slides, learning activities, and assessment instrument.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
HiddenLayer_LessonPlan_CCBYSA_HartmanCaverly_2023.pdfdisplayed 1812 times117.63 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Facilitator learning objectives

During this workshop, participants will

  • Apply prompt engineering techniques to elicit information from text-to-text generative AI (genAI) platforms

  • Appreciate a range of intellectual privacy implications posed by genAI, including: 

    • personal data;

    • intellectual property (copyright, patent, proprietary and sensitive data); 

    • AI alignment (social bias, content moderation, AI guardrails, censorship, prompt injection); 

    • synthetic media;

    • AI hallucination and mis/dis/malinformation; and

    • data sovereignty and data colonialism.

  • Engage in a simulation to develop a conceptual understanding of how the hidden layer in the neural networks underpinning large language models works

  • Synthesize their knowledge of genAI intellectual privacy considerations to analyze an ethical case study using the Agent-Impact Matrix for Artificial Intelligence (AIM4AI).

Participant learning outcomes

During this workshop, participants will

  • Interact with genAI to explore its possibilities and limitations

  • Discuss the intellectual privacy implications of genAI, including intellectual property considerations

  • Evaluate the ethics of genAI for its impact on human agency

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Hartman-Caverly, Sarah. "Hidden Layer: Intellectual Privacy and Generative AI." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2023. https://projectcora.org/assignment/hidden-layer-intellectual-privacy-and-generative-ai.
Submitted by Sarah Hartman-Caverly on August 4th, 2023
Short Description: 

This sex-positive privacy literacy workshop engages participants in exploring how sex tech impacts intimate privacy and intimate relationships. Workshop content is contextualized with the theoretical frameworks of artificial intimacies (Brooks) and consentful tech (The Consentful Tech Project) and the concept of intimate privacy (Citron) and presented through a privacy literacy lens. Participants will identify artificial intimacies in order to assess real-world examples and their impact upon intimate privacy; evaluate the privacy of digital bodies under conditions of data promiscuity using a consentful tech framework; and understand intimate privacy and the impact of technology on intimate relationships and wellbeing.

The workshop is designed for a 60-minute session, but can be extended to fill the time available.
Includes workshop guide, presentation slides, learning activities, inclusive pedagogy tool, and assessment instrument.

Learning Outcomes: 
  1. Identify artificial intimacies in order to assess real-world examples and their impact upon intimate privacy
  2. Evaluate the privacy of digital bodies under conditions of data promiscuity using a consentful tech framework
  3. Understand intimate privacy and the impact of technology on intimate relationships and wellbeing.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 
Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Hartman-Caverly, Sarah. "Private Bits: Privacy, Intimacy, and Consent." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2023. https://projectcora.org/assignment/private-bits-privacy-intimacy-and-consent.
Submitted by Ellen Carey on April 14th, 2023
Short Description: 

The SIFT* & PICK approach to evaluating sources adapts and builds on Mike Caulfield's SIFT method to help students select quality sources by practicing:

  • Lateral Reading (SIFT): fact-checking by examining other sources and internet fact-checking tools; and
  • Vertical Reading (PICK): examining the source itself to decide whether it is the best choice for their needs.

*The SIFT method was created by Mike Caulfield under a CC BY 4.0 International License.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
SIFT & PICK Fact Checking & Source Evaluation.pdfdisplayed 4443 times566.56 KB
SIFT & PICK Fact Checking & Source Evaluation without Luria Library branding.pdfdisplayed 2745 times375.72 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

After learning the SIFT & PICK Fact Checking & Source Evaluation process, students will be better able to:

  • Distinguish between lateral and vertical reading strategies for source evaluation
  • Use lateral reading strategies to fact-check information
  • Use vertical reading strategies to select the most appropriate sources for their particular needs
  • Consider how a particular source relates to a body of knowledge on a topic
Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

At Santa Barbara City College, we use SIFT & PICK in many instructional materials (e.g. research guides and Canvas modules) and guide students through this fact checking and source evaluation process in instruction interactions (research workshops, at the reference desk, in our Library 101 course, etc.).

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

The SIFT & PICK pdf and LibGuide include links to other fact fact checking and source evaluation resources.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

When teaching the SIFT & PICK Fact Checking & Source Evaluation process, we emphasize the need for both fact checking (SIFT) and critical thinking in regard to selecting which source(s) to use (PICK). When we use SIFT & PICK in research workshops, we choose which concepts and/or ACRL Frames to emphasize based on the course assignment and/or goals of the workshop.

Suggested Citation: 
Carey, Ellen. "SIFT & PICK Fact Checking & Source Evaluation." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2023. https://projectcora.org/assignment/sift-pick-fact-checking-source-evaluation.
Submitted by Tessa Withorn on February 23rd, 2023
Short Description: 

How do you detmerine whether your research has had an impact? This lesson plan covers journal and author metrics such as Journal Impact Factors, H-index, citation counts, and altmetrics. After a mini-lecture of the definitions of these metrics and how to find them using Journal Citation Reports and Google Scholar Metrics, students create a researcher profile to position themselves as scholars. 

Supplies needed: Printed researcher profile handouts.

This activity takes approxiately 30 minutes.  

Directions: Identify a university or research center you’d want to be affiliated with, and make up a title of an article you’d be interested in writing. Then, find a real journal that would publish that article. Use Google Scholar to look up the journal’s h-index and Ulrich’s to determine if it’s open access. Make up a number for how many times you think the article would be cited!

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Your Researcher Profile.pdfdisplayed 1015 times61.62 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to:

  • Describe and identify author and journal metrics
  • Identify research interests and venues for publication 
Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This activity was used in a GE course, BIOL 203: Scientific Information Litearcy and Communication course, but could be useful in a variety of disciplines and with graduate students.  

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Make sure all students can find the h-index of a journal in Google Scholar and whether a journal is open access in Ulrich's Periodicals Directory before starting the activity. 

Emphasize that students are to come up with a creative title for their own research interests, not an existing article. 

Suggested Citation: 
Withorn, Tessa. "Your Researcher Profile." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2023. https://projectcora.org/assignment/your-researcher-profile.
Submitted by Raymond Pun on February 12th, 2023
Short Description: 

ChatGPT is an generative artificial intelligence chatbot released in November 2022 by OpenAI. What are the opportunities in using this tool to teach library instruction? This document highlights various ways to engage with learners in critically analyzing ChatGPT (version GPT-3) and its responses through the ACRL Frame: Information Creation as a Process. 

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Activity- Using ChatGPT For Library Instruction- Information Creation as a Process.pdfdisplayed 2393 times29.71 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • Learn how to connect library research and instruction with ChatGPT
  • Critically analyze ChatGPT and its responses through dialogue and research
Discipline: 
Education

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Pun, Raymond. "Using ChatGPT For Library Instruction: Information Creation as a Process." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2023. https://projectcora.org/assignment/using-chatgpt-library-instruction-information-creation-process.
Submitted by Gina Trask on March 24th, 2022
Short Description: 

This lesson actively engages learners in the process of evaluating an information source using the SIFT technique, designed by Mike Caufield. The approach uses lateral reading techniques and the lesson encourages learners to apply and reflect on the technique as it pertains to a specific information need.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Activitydisplayed 1816 times27.11 KB
Example scenarios of information needs for the activitydisplayed 2020 times84.89 KB
Lesson plandisplayed 2846 times101.13 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Learners will be able to evaluate a website or online source to determine if it is appropriate to use for a specific information need.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This lesson has been taught for multiple audiences: first-year and senior college students for a specific course assignment, as a drop-in virtual workshop with college students of all levels, and as a continuing education workshop with public school educators. The lesson has also be adapted as an asynchronous module in a learning management system.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Caulfield, M. (2019, June 19). SIFT (The Four Moves). Hapgood. https://hapgood.us/2019/06/19/sift-the-four-moves/

Caulfield, M. (2017). Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers. https://webliteracy.pressbooks.com/

Lesson materials adapted from: Citizen Literacy by Robert Detmering, Amber Willenborg, and Terri Holtze for University of Louisville Libraries is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

 

Assessment or Criteria for Success
(e.g. rubric, guidelines, exemplary sample paper, etc.): 
AttachmentSize
Rubric for Activitydisplayed 1548 times81.95 KB
Assessment Short Description: 
The activity for this lesson serves as the assessment. The rubric can be used to assess the competency of the learners in regards to the SIFT technique. It may be appropriate for some learners to be at the "beginner" or "developing" stage and for others to aim for "exemplary" stage.
Suggested Citation: 
Trask, Gina. "Source Evaluation via SIFT Technique." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2022. https://projectcora.org/assignment/source-evaluation-sift-technique.
Submitted by Kelleen Maluski on February 28th, 2022
Short Description: 

This lesson was created to help further discuss issues surrounding plagiarism after a quick introduction at orientation. It was created for pharmacy PhD students but I do believe it could be useful for many learner types. A large focus on this lesson was why it is important not to plagiarize with emphasis on oppression through traditional citation and review practices. Inspiration and/or content obtained from: Conner-Gaten, Aisha. "Politics of Citation Discussion Activity." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://www.projectcora.org/assignment/politics-citation-discussion-activity.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Lesson and activity outlinesdisplayed 1064 times66.89 KB
Presentationdisplayed 1134 times1 MB
Parts of the article that we readdisplayed 1050 times75.46 KB
Activity where learners answered questions about the articledisplayed 941 times59.19 KB
2nd Activity where learners had to track down original researchdisplayed 952 times43.76 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  1. Students will understand the impact of plagiarism and why citing is important

  2. Students will reflect on oppression as perpetrated through traditional, textual citation and review practice

  3. Students will identify definitions of erasure and punitive and opportunistic plagiarism 

  4. Students will develop a strategy for citing

Discipline: 
Health

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 
Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Suggested Citation: 
Maluski, Kelleen. "Advanced Avoiding Plagiarism." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2022. https://projectcora.org/assignment/advanced-avoiding-plagiarism.

Pages