active learning

Submitted by Carolyn Schubert on June 14th, 2021
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This scaffolded assignment was developed for senior Dietetic students enrolled in a research methods course. The lessons were collaboratively created via a librarian-faculty partnership.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Lesson plan for Lesson 1displayed 867 times30.96 KB
Lesson plan for Lesson 2displayed 669 times32.54 KB
Lesson plan for Lesson 3displayed 702 times31.32 KB
Slides for Lesson 3displayed 899 times307.11 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

In general, question development using PICO format, database searching, and evidence evaluation. More specific learning goals described in individual lesson plans materials.

Discipline: 
Health

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Lessons have been implemented in-person and online, both synchronously.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Suggested Citation: 
Schubert, Carolyn. "Critical Reading Strategies for Dietetics Students." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/critical-reading-strategies-dietetics-students.
Submitted by Evelyn Hudson on May 5th, 2021
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

In this hands on activity, students will find and compare/contrast news stories on a single current event/topical discussion to learn the importance of lateral reading and understand how bias can influence information production. 

Learning Outcomes: 
  • Students will be able to find a variety of resources relating to a topic
  • Students will learn to evaluate credibility of information and information creators
  • Students will learn to read laterally relating to current events

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 
Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Suggested Citation: 
Hudson, Evelyn. "OMG, Laterally!: Objective media gathering and lateral reading Activity." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/omg-laterally-objective-media-gathering-and-lateral-reading-activity.
Submitted by Alexandria Chisholm on October 16th, 2020
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

The Penn State Berks Privacy Workshop Series focuses on privacy issues for students in the past, present, and future.  The Privacy Workshop spotlights privacy practices and concerns in the current moment; Digital Leadership explores future implications of past and current digital behaviors; Digital Shred provides tools to evaluate and mitigate the damage of past digital behaviors; and Digital Wellness focuses on privacy across the lifespan - bringing together the past, present, & future by finding a balance of technology & wellness, while aligning habits and goals.  Each workshop is grounded in theory – countering approaches that overpromise user control in the face of information asymmetries and the control paradox – and embrace students’ autonomy and agency by avoiding prescribed solutions, and instead encouraging decision-making frameworks.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
DigitalLeadershipLessonPlan_Chisholm_HartmanCaverly.pdfdisplayed 828 times157.89 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

In the Digital Leadership Workshop, students will be able to:

  1. recognize that online behavior is persistent and there is no guarantee that it will remain private (despite privacy settings)
  2. anticipate how perceptions of their online behavior can impact their personal and professional opportunities and make informed, intentional decisions regarding their activity
  3. align their online activity within the context of their future profession
  4. model constructive online behaviors as student leaders and future professionals
Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Chisholm, Alexandria. "Digital Leadership Workshop." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://projectcora.org/assignment/digital-leadership-workshop.
Submitted by Liz Bellamy on June 11th, 2020
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

When writing a research paper, it can be easy to overlook the human side of scholarship – how being cited in a study (or not) can have real, material consequences, and how social structures can systematically exclude certain people from scholarship. This activity and lesson explores these ideas and gives students strategies for making their literature reviews more inclusive.

All told, this lesson takes about 50 minutes to an hour -- 20-30 minutes for the readings and pre-workshop activity, and 30 minutes of discussion. 

AttachmentSize
Inclusive citations outline and lesson plan.docxdisplayed 1329 times20.47 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • Students will be able to articular some of the material consequences of citation practices in scholarly and research fields.
  • Students will be able to identify baseline strategies for practicing inclusive citation in their fields of study.
  • Students will be able to consider alternative sources of authority in their fields of study.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This flipped-classroom workshop was first implemented in an extracurricular summer undergraduate workshop series. It was one of many topics offered in the series, and meant to complement topics such as "Finding Full-Text Articles" and "Writing a Literature Review." The workshop has been held virtually over Blackboard and Zoom, though it can certainly be adapted to an in-person setting. 

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Readings:

1: Maha Bali, Inclusive Citation: How Diverse Are Your References?

2: Rachel Pells, Understanding the Extent of Gender Gap in Citation 

Activity:

1. After finishing the readings, complete the following activity analyzing the citation practices of a research paper of your  choice. Choose either:

  1. your own literature review up to this point, or
  2. a scholarly article you’re considering for your literature review.

Your task is to briefly analyze the gender dynamics of your chosen research paper's works cited page (up to 20 sources, max). Based on what you can infer of the genders of the authors cited, what do you notice? Is there a balance or imbalance of gender among the authors cited? 

2. Respond to this discussion board post with what you noticed during your analysis and what any gender gap or lack thereof says to you about whose voices are valued in your field. 

Instructor's note: In order to remain manageable, this activity asked students to make assumptions about gender based on superficial characteristics and sort those genders largely into a binary. Some brief classroom time was spent unpacking how, in reality, gender is a complex spectrum. 

Suggested Citation: 
Bellamy, Liz . "Whose Shoulders Are You Standing On? Inclusive Citation Practices in Literature Reviews." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://projectcora.org/assignment/whose-shoulders-are-you-standing-inclusive-citation-practices-literature-reviews.

Teaching Resource

The University of Central Florida's (UCF) Center for Distributed Learning (CDL) offers the Teaching Online Pedagogical Repository (TOPR) as a public resource for faculty and instructional designers interested in online and blended teaching strateg

Submitted by Alexandria Chisholm on March 23rd, 2020
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

The Penn State Berks Privacy Workshop Series focuses on privacy issues for students in the past, present, and future.  The Privacy Workshop spotlights privacy practices and concerns in the current moment; Digital Leadership explores future implications of past and current digital behaviors; Digital Shred provides tools to evaluate and mitigate the damage of past digital behaviors; and Digital Wellness focuses on privacy across the lifespan - bringing together the past, present, & future by finding a balance of technology & wellness, while aligning habits and goals.  Each workshop is grounded in theory – countering approaches that overpromise user control in the face of information asymmetries and the control paradox – and embrace students’ autonomy and agency by avoiding prescribed solutions, and instead encouraging decision-making frameworks.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
DigitalWellnessWheel.pdfdisplayed 4073 times1.78 MB
DigitalWellnessLessonPlan_Chisholm_HartmanCaverly.pdfdisplayed 3012 times172.74 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

In the Digital Wellness Workshop, students will be able to:

  1. evaluate & articulate their digital wellness priorities
  2. recognize that their relationship with technology can have real world impact on their personal wellbeing, including relationships, mental health, & professional aspirations
  3. align their online activity & habits within the context of their wellness goals
  4. model constructive online and offline behaviors as individuals, student leaders, and future professionals
Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Chisholm, Alexandria. "Digital Wellness Workshop." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://projectcora.org/assignment/digital-wellness-workshop.
Submitted by Alexandria Chisholm on March 23rd, 2020
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

The Penn State Berks Privacy Workshop Series focuses on privacy issues for students in the past, present, and future.  The Privacy Workshop spotlights privacy practices and concerns in the current moment; Digital Leadership explores future implications of past and current digital behaviors; Digital Shred provides tools to evaluate and mitigate the damage of past digital behaviors; and Digital Wellness focuses on privacy across the lifespan - bringing together the past, present, & future by finding a balance of technology & wellness, while aligning habits and goals.  Each workshop is grounded in theory – countering approaches that overpromise user control in the face of information asymmetries and the control paradox – and embrace students’ autonomy and agency by avoiding prescribed solutions, and instead encouraging decision-making frameworks.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
PersonalDataIntegrityPlan_DigitalShred_PennStateBerks.pdfdisplayed 1156 times625.92 KB
DamageAssessment_IdealPortfolio_DigitalShred_PennStateBerks.pdfdisplayed 715 times786.93 KB
DigitalShredLessonPlan_Chisholm_HartmanCaverly_Glenn.pdfdisplayed 821 times165.59 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

In the Digital Shred Workshop, students will be able to:

  1. Reflect on and describe their digital privacy priorities in order to articulate the benefits and risks of their digital dossier
  2. Apply a growth mindset to critically examine their current data exhaust // digital footprint and recognize when change is needed
  3. Develop a Personal Data Integrity Plan that makes routine the process of auditing and updating their digital dossier in alignment with their privacy values
  4. Describe “digital shred” and its importance.
Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Chisholm, Alexandria. "Digital Shred Workshop." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://projectcora.org/assignment/digital-shred-workshop.
Submitted by Aisha Conner-Gaten on March 4th, 2020
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Using three example excerpts on citation practice and the experiences of specific scholars, attendees will interrogate and discuss how whiteness and other oppressions impact citation practice using a series of questions. 

AttachmentSize
Example Excerpt 1 on Misogynoirdisplayed 1059 times63.08 KB
Example Excerpt 2 on Peer Review for Indigenous Scholarsdisplayed 1023 times63.16 KB
Example Excerpt 3 on Citing Problematic Scholarsdisplayed 872 times63.25 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

By Example Number
Example 1:

  • Attendees will identify definitions of erasure and punitive and opportunistic plagiarism 
  • Attendees will reflect on oppression as perpetrated through traditional, textual citation practice

Example 2:

  • Attendees will examine the ways in which indigenous scholars navigate peer review
  • Attendees will reflect on oppression as perpetrated through traditional, textual citation practice

Example 3:

  • Attendees will examine the pros and cons of citing problematic scholars
  • Attendees will develop a strategy for citing problematic scholars bolstered by their personal ethics
  • Attendees will reflect on oppression as perpetrated through traditional, textual citaiton practice

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This activity was done during a citation panel event: https://cal.lmu.edu/event/citations2020#.XmA4O5NKhTY. This was 25 minutes (15 minutes to read and discuss in pairs and 10 minutes to share with the larger group). Discussion was facilitated.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

When facilitating larger discussion, provide summary of each reading as some groups may need context. Review each questions so attendees can share notes taken. Save last question of each example for a shared discussion (each example has same last question).

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Conner-Gaten, Aisha. "Politics of Citation Discussion Activity." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://projectcora.org/assignment/politics-citation-discussion-activity.
Submitted by Duke University Libraries RIS Team on December 4th, 2019
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This lesson on journal prestige could be taught by itself, as part of a series on scholarly communication, or as a small part of a larger lesson on information prestige.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Citations for Info Privilege Lessons Mediadisplayed 922 times10.84 KB
Lesson Plandisplayed 1069 times377.57 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will recognize the practices of scholarly publishers

Students will evaluate whether citation count is a good indicator of authority

Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Individual or Group:

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

This topic could fit well into instruction sessions that include significant treatment of source evaluation and is one potential approach as you move beyond simple categorization of sources as scholarly/non-scholarly or primary/secondary. It stops short of a critical examination of construction of authority but could be used to hint at greater subtlety and complexity. This topic has particular relevance for upper level undergraduates engaged in research, who may be starting to think about publication from an author’s perspective.

Suggested Citation: 
RIS Team, Duke University Libraries. "Journal Prestige." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/journal-prestige.
Submitted by Duke University Libraries RIS Team on November 26th, 2019
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This is an activity to get students to think critically about the sources and information presented in a Wikipedia article. Students are asked to look up an article on their own topic, or a topic related to the course, and examine the content and the “Talk” page to see what issues the article has related to Wikipedia’s 3 guiding principles for content: point of view (objectivity/bias), verifiability (quality of sources cited), and evidence of original researchNOTE: This activity works best for topics (people, events) that are current public debates and/or controversial.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Directions for Instructordisplayed 956 times13.54 KB
Evaluating a Controversial Topic Activitydisplayed 1030 times1.01 MB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will define Wikipedia’s guiding content principles

Students will evaluate a topic by investigating Wikipedia talk pages related to it

Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 
Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Suggested Citation: 
RIS Team, Duke University Libraries. "Researching a Controversy." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/researching-controversy.

Pages