Rhetoric, Composition, and Writing

Submitted by Lindsey McLean on January 5th, 2016
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This assignment was designed to incorporate information literacy concepts into an in depth writing assignment. By only focusing on a total of one outside source at a time, students are required to do deep research to find the one source that they can engage with on the level required for a good essay. Requiring a small number of sources also allows the students to practice incorporating outside material into their own writing and thinking and allows the instructor to see progress in this area.

Exercise One:

Choose a phenomenon, situation, or event that relates to family life in the United States. Examples of this could be gay marriage, international adoption, divorce, immigration, or a phenomenon that has directly impacted your own family. Find one scholarly source written by a sociologist related to your topic and write a 1200 word essay (+/- 10%) that describes the phenomenon as you understand it, identifies how it is connected to family life in the United States, why you are interested in it, the ideas presented by the author of the source, and how those ideas add to your knowledge or understanding of the phenomenon. Cite your source properly in text using ASA style and include a full ASA citation for it at the end or your paper.

Exercise Two:

Find a second scholarly source written by a sociologist on the phenomena you selected. Write a 600 (+/- 10%) word addendum to your original essay that details the ideas presented by the second scholar and how these ideas further enhance or complicate your understanding of the phenomena. Cite your sources properly in text using ASA style and include a full ASA citation for your sources at the end or your paper.

Library Instruction:This exercise would benefit from a library instruction session focused on the first learning outcome – identifying scholarly sources and finding discipline specific information

  • Discussion of identifying scholarly sources (ending with the three-point test for scholarly information: peer-reviewed or extensively edited, included citations, written by a scholar from within the discipline)
  • Finding scholarly sources using discipline specific tools (for sociology: Sociological Abstracts, Social Science Citation Index)
Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Writing, Analysis, and Disciplinary Discourse Learning Sequence - McLean.docxdisplayed 952 times18.5 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  1. Students will be able to identify and find scholarly sources within a specific discipline.
  2. Students will be able to thoughtfully and ethically integrate discipline specific scholarly sources into their writing.

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
McLean, Lindsey. "Writing, Analysis, and Disciplinary Discourse." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2016. https://projectcora.org/assignment/writing-analysis-and-disciplinary-discourse.
Submitted by Lindsey McLean on January 5th, 2016
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

In this sequence of activities, students will learn how to identify scholarly sources using three pronged test: 1) Is the source written by a researcher or academic 2) Is the source published in a scholarly book or peer reviewed journal, and 3) Does the source have an extensive bibliography. They will then be asked to find one scholarly book and one scholarly article on a general topic.

Learning Activities

Scholarly source pre-test

  • Description of activity: Students will complete a three-five question true/false pretest. Each question will present the student with a source and ask them if the source is scholarly (true/false).
  • Learning goal: Students will understand what they do and do not know about identifying scholarly sources. The pretest also works as an assessment strategy as well as a strategy for retention of the material.

Short lecture/discussion

  • Description of activity: Instructor will lead students in a discussion about the elements that all scholarly sources have. This will lead to the list of the three-pronged test: 1) Is the source written by a researcher or academic 2) Is the source published in a scholarly book or peer reviewed journal, and 3) Does the source have an extensive bibliography. The instructor is leading the discussion should be creating a list on the board. This discussion should also include a specific mention that credible sources and academic sources are not always the same. A source can be credible without being scholarly and scholarly sources have been known to be not credible.
  • Learning goal: Students will be able to apply the three pronged test to decide is a source is scholarly or not.
  • Assessment: At the end of the discussion the Instructor will present students with a blog written by an academic that discusses a research project they worked on and includes a short list of cited reference at the end. The instructor will ask the class to vote on whether or not it is a scholarly source.

Find two scholarly sources

  • Description of activity: Instructor will present students with a general topic (e.g. student debt) and ask them to find one scholarly book or book chapter and one scholarly article on the topic using whatever search tool they want (this can be done in pairs or groups of three). When they have found the sources, they will complete a Google form similar to this: http://libguides.lmu.edu/RHET1000/task (including asking what they used to find the sources – Google, Discovery layer, etc.). When the students are finished, the Instructor will project the results of the Google form and look at the search tools used by the students. If the students are overwhelming using Google or JSTOR, the instructor will discuss more useful places to find sources. Then the Instructor will randomly select some of the books and article the students found and ask they group how they identified them as scholarly.
  • Learning goal: Students will be able to find scholarly books and articles.
  • Assessment: At the end of the semester, librarian will collect final papers and assess the student bibliographies looking for evidence of scholarly sources. 
Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Identifying Scholalry Sources Learning Activities Sequence - McLean.docxdisplayed 1403 times19.39 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  1. Students will be able to identify scholarly sources.
  2. Students will be able to find scholarly books and scholarly articles. 

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This assignment was designed to function as a librarian led workshop that is offerend in conjuction with a research assignment. Idealy, this type of workshop would take place at a strategic time in the course; perhaps around two weeks before an annotated bibliography or first draft is due. 

Suggested Citation: 
McLean, Lindsey. "Identify and Find Scholarly Sources." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2016. https://projectcora.org/assignment/identify-and-find-scholarly-sources.
Submitted by Carolyn Caffrey on November 5th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

The following activity is meant to assist learning the concepts of strategic search. It introduces the idea that sources contribute different perspectives to an argument and that scholarship is a conversation. It can be used for any discipline but is particularly well suited to introductory writing courses.

Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to.... Develop a strategic search plan Demonstrate an understanding of citation style in order to track a scholarly conversation

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This activity can be used after or during an introduction to strategic searching in a one-shot instruction session. After presenting the shortened URL on the screen; students independently complete their row in the spreadsheet. The instructor/librarian can help students individually during this time period with their own search topics. The instruction/librarian can display the spreadsheet using projection and use the rows and student work to initiate conversation around various points for example by asking does anyone have an additional keyword they think Student A would want to use? The students can return to the shortened link at any time to view the work they did in class and the spreadsheet can be used for the librarian to assess the session. If not every student has a computer this activity can also be completed in small groups. Variations: Have students work in pairs or small groups with one person's topic. (Especially if not everyone has a laptop) Mix up the questions Have students complete the form as homework for a flipped class session

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Further reading: Simpson, S. R. (2012). Google Spreadsheets and real-time assessment Instant feedback for library instruction. College & Research Libraries News, 73(9), 528–549. http://crln.acrl.org/content/73/9/528.full

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

-Shorten the URL using a URL shortener like Bit.ly or Goo.gl to the Google Sheet so that students can easily type it in and access it if you aren't able to provide it to them directly through a course management system or other means -Double check your "Share" settings in the top right corner of the document. You want anyone to be able to edit the document if they have the link. This is not the default setting so you will need to change it -In an in-person setting having student count off by row number helps make sure students don't write over each other when claiming a row

Suggested Citation: 
Caffrey, Carolyn . "Strategic Searching Spreadsheet." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/strategic-searching-spreadsheet.
Submitted by Susan Archambault on August 6th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This assignment is designed to help students develop a thoughtful research topic. Students go through a series of steps, questions, and background reading to help them better understand and refine a research topic.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
DevelopingResearchTopic_socialjustice_FINAL.pdfdisplayed 4566 times263.92 KB
DevelopingResearchTopic_socialjustice_FINAL.docxdisplayed 1953 times297.42 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • Conceptualize and refine an effective research topic
  • Value information and sources from different perspectives
  • Contextualize a research topic by drawing upon their own intellectual curiosity or personal experience

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This exercise is due week 3, usually before library instruction. As a result, the library created a 4-minute instruction video done as a pre-visit homework assignment called "Developing a Topic with CQ Researcher and Opposing Viewpoints" available on this LibGuide: http://libguides.lmu.edu/RHET1000/LibraryVisit

Using a Topic Development exercise, students will explore and conduct preliminary research on three separate research topics. This is in conjunction with the Information Literacy component of the course as stated in "Rhetorical Arts: Speaking and Writing for Social Justice" common syllabus. A requirement for all first-year students, Rhetorical Arts is a course designed specifically to integrate important skills- information literacy, writing, and public speaking- into the Jesuit Rhetorical Tradition "Eloquentia Perfecta." Students will also engage with important ethical themes related to the common good. 

This is the first assignment in a sequence of writing and oral assignments (followed by a Research Proposal, Annotated Bibliography, Persuasive Research Paper, etc.). Each successive assignment expands on the previous assignments.

Assessment or Criteria for Success
(e.g. rubric, guidelines, exemplary sample paper, etc.): 
AttachmentSize
Rubric for Research Exploration.docxdisplayed 1223 times22.71 KB
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Some students may think this is busy work. Don't allow students to turn this in at the end of the semester with their final paper, as this defeats the purpose of sequencing assignments.

Suggested Citation: 
Archambault, Susan. "Research Exploration Exercise." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/research-exploration-exercise.
Submitted by Jennifer Masunaga on July 14th, 2015
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This assignment is meant to illustrate the differences between scholarly and popular information sources by presenting students with information on the topic of "fracking" from four different resources: a scholarly article, a magazine, a newspaper and a website. It introduces the idea that information can be presented in different formats depending on the context and information need.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Source_Evaluation.docxdisplayed 2171 times20.32 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

At the end of this activity, students should… • Be able to compare and contrast four different types of information sources • Recognize differences between scholarly and non-scholarly articles. • Recognize the importance of authorship

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Masunaga, Jennifer. "Scholarly vs. Popular ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://projectcora.org/assignment/scholarly-vs-popular.

Teaching Resource

Writing Commons  is an open education resource that helps students improve their writing, critical thinking, and information literacy. Founded in 2008 by Joseph M.

Pages