Undergraduate / Bachelors

Submitted by Sara Davidson Squibb on June 25th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

The Value of Free and Deep Web Resources (aka Google vs. Databases)

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Lesson Plan - Value of Free and Deep Web Resourcesdisplayed 3601 times27 KB
Handout - Scenarios - Where to Search?displayed 1474 times80.45 KB
Handout Key - Scenarios - Where to Search?displayed 1190 times16.26 KB
Blank Chart - Compare Pros Cons - Google vs Databasesdisplayed 1162 times48.41 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to …
• articulate the value of using both the free web (e.g. Google) and the deep web (e.g. databases) to find sources.
• recognize that an information need may influence where one chooses to search.

Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

We created this lesson for using in beginning composition classes with the intent that Writing instructor could adopt and incorporate this content and conversation into their course. A librarian taught this lesson in one of these classes though she modified Part III to be less formal.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

See attached.

Assessment or Criteria for Success
Assessment Short Description: 
Return to the outcomes and ask students to articulate the value of Google and databases. Ask what factors they will consider when determining where to search.
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

It is helpful to have two screens when comparing results from Google vs. a selected database. It can be easy to get into the weeds of using the search tool when this is not the focus of the lesson. There is opportunity to change search scenarios to topics being discussed in the class.

Suggested Citation: 
Davidson Squibb, Sara . "Where Should I Search? It Depends!." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/where-should-i-search-it-depends.
Submitted by Katrina Stierholz on June 24th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

A hybrid teaching module with two elements: an interactive online module for students to complete ahead of class and a face-to-face lesson plan that builds on the skills learned in the online lesson. The in-class session provides students with a critical exploration of the purchasing power of minimum wages across states and/or the earnings gap between men and women employed full time.

The pre-class online course is titled: “FRED Interactive: Information Literacy” available through www.econlowdown.org. In the online course, students review a FRED graph made in the course; define the concepts nominal, real, and inflation; and discuss basic strategies for establishing the reliability of a data source.

The in-person class lesson is titled: ACRL Information Literacy Frames as FRED-Integrated Abilities: The frames Research as Inquiry, Information Creation as a Process, Scholarship as Conversation, and Authority Is Constructed and Contextual are highlighted. The instructor has two possible tasks for students;
-Option A, students work in FRED and use the formula real = (nominal/CPI)*100 to plot inflation-adjusted minimum wage rates for two states and compare the results.
-Option B, students work in FRED to plot and compare nominal and real earnings differentials for men and woman.

The lesson includes a variety of in-class and out-of-class assessment activities and links to resources and a glossary of terms provide additional learning opportunities.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Keeping_It_Real.pdfdisplayed 1079 times281.15 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will:

Create
❏ New FRED® graphs

Define
❏ Minimum wage
❏ Nominal and real wages
❏ Consumer price inflation (CPI)

Identify
❏ Metadata in a FRED graph
❏ Additional questions for further research

Describe
❏ The frequency of data collection
❏ The components of a data citation
❏ The difference between data sources and aggregators
❏ The reasons for knowing how data are collected
❏ The difference between nominal and real wages
❏ The issues of authority regarding trustworthiness, reliability, and credibility of data sources

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Stierholz, Katrina. "Keeping It Real: Teach ACRL Information Literacy Frames with FRED data ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/keeping-it-real-teach-acrl-information-literacy-frames-fred-data.
Submitted by Jo Angela Oehrli on June 20th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

What is “fake news” anyway? Are we living in a post-truth world? These University of Michigan course materials will provide opportunities to discuss and analyze news production, consumption and evaluation. Students will develop the critical thinking skills necessary to be an informed citizen; understand how their worldview affects their interpretation of the news; and create a personal strategy for fact-checking and evaluating the news. Topics include types of “fake news” such as misinformation and disinformation; economic and technological contexts of the news media; psychological and social factors of media consumption; and the impact of news on our society.

Learning Outcomes: 

After participating in this course, students will be able to:
1. Critically evaluate news sources in order to determine content credibility.
2. Develop and implement a strategy to make an informed opinion about current topics and issues in order to become a better informed citizen
3. Identify types of “fake news” including misinformation, disinformation, biased information, propaganda, and satire in order to determine the credibility of news content
4. Describe the news production process and information landscape in order to recognize the impact of the economic and technological context
5. Analyze the impact of psychological and social factors on media consumption in order to reflect on their own personal media consumption behaviors and practices
6. Discuss the individual and societal impacts of news literacy in order to understand its importance to public policy and democracy.

Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Individual or Group:

Tags:

Suggested Citation: 
Oehrli, Jo Angela. "Fake News, Lies, and Propaganda: How to Sort Fact from Fiction." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/fake-news-lies-and-propaganda-how-sort-fact-fiction.
Submitted by Gail Gradowski on June 14th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This is designed to introduce students to the wonderful world of periodicals, in their great variety, and to how they will appear in different databases. It also begins the work of building their skills at evaluating information sources, determining perspective.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
This is the worksheet, including the answers!displayed 986 times52 KB
This is the optional worksheet described in the lesson plan.displayed 725 times15.12 KB
This is, essentially, a lesson plan and script.displayed 832 times16.82 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

• Identify a periodical source;
• Describe different periodical information sources;
• Identify relevant author credentials;
• Describe relevant author credentials.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This activity is a great one to be done right before students are going to begin searching for articles for their own research projects. I have used it that way many times.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

This exercise works well as a prelude to another I've uploaded here, What Exactly IS the Source You are Quoting From?, which works on teaching students how to contextualize their evidence/sources in their writing.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

One pitfall is that students very often answer the questions with very obvious and superficial remarks, so it is important to really respond to their answers and make them "go back and try again!" It can be helpful to have "prizes" for coming up with insightful responses!

When selecting the articles to use in this exercise, I always try to make sure the links are to different databases so part of what they learn is that the article can appear very different in different databases. e.g. EBSCO, Gale, Nexis, Proquest!

Suggested Citation: 
Gradowski, Gail. "You Say Periodical. I Say Magazine. And then there are Journals! What Does It Matter as Long as I can Get the PDF?." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/you-say-periodical-i-say-magazine-and-then-there-are-journals-what-does-it-matter-long-i.
Submitted by Gail Gradowski on June 14th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This exercise was designed for 1st year writing students with several different goals in mind: • encourage deeper, closer reading; • introduce the concept that information sources have perspective; • develop vocabulary around describing information and perspective; • acquaint students with the many values/uses of subject encyclopedias; • practice topic narrowing using these types of encyclopedia articles.

Learning Outcomes: 

• Distinguish/discern differences in treatment of the same subject in different texts. • Differentiate/recognize different types of information sources in lists of references. • Assess/compare/contrast author credentials. • Assess/compare/contrast authority, audience and perspective of various subject encyclopedias.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Students love wikipedia, and this exercise builds on that. They tell me that one of the ways they use wikipedia is to help them narrow their topic. I've often recommended to students that they read some encyclopedia articles to help them focus/narrow/define their research question. This exercise can serve as a way to encourage that use. It could be immediately followed by having them locate subject encyclopedia articles for themselves.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

When they are in their groups composing their presentation, you will need to encourage them to go into more detail, cite examples from the texts to support their claims. They will initially be making very broad, general statements. Students working on the 4th question will probably need the most assistance.

Suggested Citation: 
Gradowski, Gail. "Pick One, Any One? They're all just encyclopedia articles . . .." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/pick-one-any-one-theyre-all-just-encyclopedia-articles.
Submitted by Jeffrey Dowdy on June 11th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This session was part of an undergraduate, critical thinking and global perspectives course. The course is offered by various disciplines on campus. This instance focused on global challenges (The Seven Revolutions developed by csis.org). For the session the students applied two frameworks to data: authority is constructed and contextual and scholarship as conversation. Students learned about a data life cycle concept with emphasis on evaluation. One of the main goals in introducing the students to the life cycle of data (see attached) was to broaden their understanding of how to search for data. Students may encounter data via social media or in a magazine article. Often those formats are more accessible and present data in a way that is easier to understand. The exercise helps students to see how data can sometimes be manipulated in those formats, while also developing search techniques to track data to its source.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Slide 2 gives an illustration of the data lifecycledisplayed 1092 times663.82 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Employ credible resources in studying key global challenges

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

The data literacy session was part of a semester-long, scaffolded research paper on a specific global challenge. Students were encouraged to use data to back up their arguments and research.

Assessment or Criteria for Success
Assessment Short Description: 
One issue with the assignment in its present form: students misunderstood the first question of the assignment (Provide two examples of types of data that inform your research topic). Many interpreted 'types' to mean actual data sets or reports instead of brainstorming about what data could exist. One hurdle students face, as Daniel Russell research scientist for Google would put it, is understanding how search works and what it can do for them. Students must know what questions they can ask. The first question was intended to help them think about what they could ask. This will require more modeling in the introduction.
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

For future iterations of this topic, I would like for students to evaluate multiple examples of data used in journalistic writing. Both to understand how to write with data and to see how data can be employed to make a point or to support a story.

Suggested Citation: 
Dowdy, Jeffrey. "Data Literacy." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/data-literacy.
Submitted by Gail Gradowski on May 25th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This is a 65-minute workshop designed for 1st year composition students who will be using periodical sources in their research. Students will practice writing contextualizing statements, e.g. describing authors, genres, types of periodicals, for a variety of information sources of the type they will be using in their own research projects.

Learning Outcomes: 

• Identify different types of periodical information sources;
• Describe different periodical information sources;
• Identify relevant author credentials;
• Describe relevant author credentials;
• Compose a valid contextualizing statement describing an information source.

Individual or Group:

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

When deciding on the link to use to the various periodical sources, it is a good idea to provide variety, e.g. EBSCO, Proquest, Sage. The first challenge for students will be to identify the title of the periodical source itself.

Suggested Citation: 
Gradowski, Gail. "What Exactly IS that Source You are Quoting From?." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/what-exactly-source-you-are-quoting.
Submitted by Tessa Withorn on May 25th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This concept map and activity explores how various sources of information are created, accessed, and shared. Students collaboratively define what makes a source traditional, emerging, public, or exclusive. Students are given a type of information source to map on the grid according to each axis, and provide a rationale for their placement.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
The Information Spectrum Lesson Plan.docxdisplayed 1366 times150.74 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to: 1) articulate the traditional and emerging processes of information creation and dissemination; 2) articulate the value and constraints of public and exclusive information; 3) assess the fit between an information product’s creation process and a particular information need.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This activity was used in a first-year writing course that did not include in-depth research, but students were encouraged to use a variety of sources, including primary sources. The assignment asked students to analyze a cultural artifact and how it has changed over time, such as the telephone or automobile. At the beginning of the class, the instruction librarian introduced the Information Spectrum concept map and asked students to collaboratively define characteristics of an information source in terms of traditional, emerging, public, and exclusive. With the Information Spectrum projected on a whiteboard, each student was given a slip of paper with a type of information source (e.g. print book, online news article, tweet) and a piece of tape to place on the grid. Students were asked to give a rationale for why they placed their source where they did. Students then worked in groups of 2-3 to evaluate a specific source related to an example topic. At the end of class, each group was given another slip of paper with their example source to map on the grid and provide a rationale.

Assessment or Criteria for Success
Assessment Short Description: 
In an online discussion forum or post-session survey, ask students to describe sources they might use for their assignment or for a given scenario according to the Information Spectrum.
Suggested Citation: 
Withorn, Tessa. "The Information Spectrum." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/information-spectrum.
Submitted by Melanie Hubbard on May 16th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

In this assignment students work in groups on closely reading international policy documents, noting substantive changes in a policy area over time, and ploting those changes in the timeline tool, TimelineJS.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
InternationalPolicy_Timeline.docxdisplayed 1360 times25.46 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will learn how to closely read and annotate policy, how to use Timeline JS, and how to present complex information in a concise and visual format.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Students worked in groups of three. Video tutorials were made to teach them how to use Timeline JS and the digital scholarship librarian checked in on them periodically and made herself available when they needed help.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Suggested Citation: 
Hubbard, Melanie. "Evolution of International Policy and Policy Areas." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/evolution-international-policy-and-policy-areas.
Submitted by Melanie Hubbard on May 16th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

In this exercise students use the Voyant word analysis tool to analyze Baldwin’s The Fire Next Time. (Any literary work would work.)

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Literature_Voyant_Word-Analysis.docxdisplayed 908 times21.89 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will gain: an understanding of how Voyant (and other word analysis tools) work and the basic ability to use the tool, an understanding of how word analysis can be used for literary studies, and the ability to think critically about word analysis tools.

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Hubbard, Melanie. "Literary Work Word Analysis ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/literary-work-word-analysis.

Pages