Multidisciplinary

Submitted by Alexandria Chisholm on December 6th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This workshop delivers an action-oriented introduction to personal data privacy designed for new college students. The session is designed to reveal the systems in place to collect and analyze online behavioral data, and to unveil the real-world consequences of online profiling in contexts like sentiment shaping, consumer preferences, employment, healthcare, personal finance, and law enforcement. In lieu of a prescriptive approach, students analyze case studies to observe how online behaviors impact real-world opportunities and reflect on the benefits and risks of technology use to develop purposeful online behaviors and habits that align with their individual values. Developing knowledge practices regarding privacy and the commodification of personal information and embodying the core library values of privacy and intellectual freedom, the workshop promotes a proactive rather than reactive approach and presents a spectrum of privacy preferences across a range of contexts in order to respect students’ autonomy and agency in personal technology use.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
PersonalDataPlan_PennStateBerks.pdfdisplayed 1195 times622.24 KB
PrivacyWorkshopLessonPlan_Chisholm_Hartman-Caverly.pdfdisplayed 728 times189.3 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to: 1. recognize how their personal data and metadata are collected, along with the potential implications of such data collection 2. assess how their data is shared and make informed, intentional choices to safeguard their privacy 3. identify privacy issues facing our society 4. describe the positive case for privacy as a human right fundamental to individual well-being

Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Chisholm, Alexandria. "Privacy Workshop." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/privacy-workshop.
Submitted by Kirsten Hansen on November 20th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

In this assignment, students are given a range of newspaper article about science topics and work in pairs to find the original research article that the newspaper article is based on in the library databases. Students then assess when they might use an original research article vs when they might use a well-written newspaper article.

After the activity, the librarian gave short lecture about online fact checking based on Mike Caulfield's excellent fast and frugal fact checking strategies. If time allows, students can do some of the activities that Caulfield lists in his textbook.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Powerpoint presentation to accompany the assignmentdisplayed 1338 times93.52 KB
Outline of the assignmentdisplayed 1044 times17.73 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Frames: Authority is constructed and contextual/Information creation as a process
Students will be able to:
• recognize that information may be perceived differently based on the format in which it is packaged
• Assess the fit between a source’s creation process and the particular information need
• Assess the fit between a source’s argument, methodology, and authority and the particular information need
• Use research tools and indicators of authority to determine the credibility of sources, understanding the elements that might temper this credibility

I will know students have achieved the learning outcomes:
Students wil be able to move “backwards” from popular science articles (i.e. NPR, NYT, Scientific American and the like) to the original research articles on which the articles are based. Students will then articulate strengths/weaknesses of the types of articles and when they might use them.

Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

The genesis of this activity was a class about why people do or do not believe scientific conclusions. Mechanically, it can be used to help students practice moving from information “in the wild” as reported by the media to the original research articles. Conceptually, it can be used to help students evaluate how well or poorly scholarly research is reported by the press and to understand that different formats are useful at different times, and that different types of authority (reporter vs researchers) are constructed and contextual.)

This activity could be used in any class where students need to learn how to find the original scholarly articles that give birth to newspaper or other media articles.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

If you are not very familiar with a subject area, it may be challenging to find appropriate articles for this assignment. In my case, the professor found the articles we used and it worked out well.

Suggested Citation: 
Hansen, Kirsten. "From newspaper article to research article: backtracking to find original research." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/newspaper-article-research-article-backtracking-find-original-research.
Submitted by Jennifer Masunaga on November 7th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This 30-minute activity demonstrates how to search in Google Scholar and explains how results are ranked. It requires students to explore Google Scholar and encourages students to reflect on potential biases this tool might have in regards to research. This lesson plan was Part 2 of an hour-long workshop that also included a 30 minute search engine algorithmic bias lesson. Please see Elisa Slater Acosta's page for part 1: https://www.projectcora.org/assignment/exploring-algorithmic-bias-summer...

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Lesson Plandisplayed 2548 times56.96 KB
Worksheetdisplayed 1209 times105.46 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

1. Students will be able to search Google Scholar in order to find scholarly and discipline specific sources for their information need.

2. Students will understand Google Scholar’s limitations and biases in order to critically evaluate their search results.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This lesson was done for the the Computer Science Summer Institute Extension Program, or CCSIX, is a 3-week on-campus summer experience for first-year students studying computer science and related STEM fields at Loyola Marymount University. This program is designed for groups underrepresented in computing (i.e., women, underrepresented minorities in STEM, and first-generation or low-income college students). https://cssiextension.withgoogle.com/

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Masunaga, Jennifer. "Exploring Google Scholar with a Summer Bridge Program ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/exploring-google-scholar-summer-bridge-program.
Submitted by Elisa Acosta on October 28th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This 30-minute activity was a quick introduction to algorithmic bias and the importance of critically evaluating search engine results. Algorithms increasingly shape modern life and can perpetuate bias and discrimination. In pairs, students analyzed the results from Google Image searches and Google Autocomplete suggestions. This activity was based on “Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism,” by Safiya Umoja Noble. This lesson plan was Part 1 of an hour-long workshop that also included a 30 minute Google Scholar activity. Please see Jennifer Masanaga's Google Scholar activity for Part 2: https://www.projectcora.org/assignment/exploring-google-scholar-summer-b...

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Lesson Plandisplayed 4826 times154.64 KB
Presentation slidesdisplayed 2256 times3.37 MB
Worksheetdisplayed 1801 times326.34 KB
Suggested Readingsdisplayed 1204 times65.96 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

1. Students will discuss the effects of algorithm bias in order to articulate how some individuals or groups of individuals may be misrepresented or systematically marginalized in search engine results. 2. Students will develop an attitude of informed skepticism in order to critically evaluate Google search results.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

The Computer Science Summer Institute Extension Program, or CCSIX, is a 3-week on-campus summer experience for first-year students studying computer science and related STEM fields. This program is designed for groups underrepresented in computing (i.e., women, underrepresented minorities in STEM, and first-generation or low-income college students). https://cssiextension.withgoogle.com/

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Incoming first-year students were shy and quiet. I revised the lesson plan to include more Think-Pair-Share and less all-class discussion. The instructor should model the Google Images activity first (Professor Style), then let students do the second activity (Computer Scientist) together in pairs. The students liked “partner time.” This was a summer bridge program, so we decided to keep the worksheets short and the activities social (students talking to each other).

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Acosta, Elisa. "Exploring Algorithmic Bias with a Summer Bridge Program." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/exploring-algorithmic-bias-summer-bridge-program.

Teaching Resource

Drawing upon research in psychology, education, and cognitive science, the authors (Susan A. Ambrose, Michael W. Bridges, Michele DiPietro, Marsha C. Lovett, Marie K. Norman) explain seven powerful learning principles.

Teaching Resource

Reading an academic text in a paper format can be challenging, and reading it online adds complexity to the task.

Teaching Resource

Learning technologists have been developing frameworks for course design, development, delivery, and evaluation. A framework, typically in the form of a rubric or checklist, describes the characteristics of a successful online course.

Submitted by Jessea Young on October 18th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

The “Open Access: Strategies and Tools for Life after College” workshop was developed to give students the tools to continue academic research after graduation. Students may not recognize that the library provides many electronic resources for their research that is automatically given to them during their enrollment; by acknowledging their privileged access to information, they are prepared to be responsible researchers beyond campus. The workshop was requested by international students who were concerned about losing access to LMU resources when they returned home.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Lesson Plandisplayed 1623 times1.18 MB
Presentation Slidesdisplayed 1123 times2.2 MB
Information Privilege Worksheetdisplayed 1002 times21.4 KB
Open Access Only Worksheetdisplayed 936 times21 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

1. Students will be able to define the following terms: open access, paywalls, and information privilege.
2. Students will appreciate the impact of open access scholarship and it’s benefit to the public good.
3. Students will be able to search the appropriate open access tool in order to find free scholarly content.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This workshop was created for the Summer Undergraduate Research Program (SURP). Faculty mentors and Librarians hold workshops and seminars throughout the summer to help SURP students build their research and presentation skills. Three international students suggested the workshop topic! They wanted to know more about ResearchGate and how to find free scholarly information once they left LMU.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Further Readings

"Information Privilege Outreach for Undergraduate Students" by Sarah Hare, Cara Evanson.
https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/16767

You’re a Researcher Without a Library: What Do You Do? by Jake Orlowitz.
https://medium.com/a-wikipedia-librarian/youre-a-researcher-without-a-li...

Assessment or Criteria for Success
Assessment Short Description: 
Students were asked to reflect on the workshop and submit their comments via Google Forms. Students really liked the Case Study.
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Originally, the workshop was scheduled for 1 hour. Next year we would like to schedule a longer 1.5 hour workshop or assign the case study article as homework. Technology was an issue too. There’s no way to “turn off” database access (or turn off Information Privilege) while on campus. It’s difficult to simulate an Open Access Only environment so that students could practice using OA tools and strategies. We tried with Google Scholar and PubMed by turning off the “Library links” settings. Also we asked the students to pretend or imagine that they didn’t have access.

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Young, Jessea. "Open Access: Strategies and Tools for Life after College ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/open-access-strategies-and-tools-life-after-college.
Submitted by Pascal Martinolli on July 24th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

A scholarly character sheet for self-assessment about information literacy skills - gamification around quantified self, badging and young researcher identity.

Une feuille d'autoévaluation pour suivre les apprentissages en compétences informationnelles acquises sur le moyen ou le long terme. Elle est ludifiée avec des éléments de mesure de soi, de badge et d'identité de jeune chercheur.

Learning Outcomes: 

Self-assessment, measurement of progress & end of course wrap-up.

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Martinolli, Pascal. "Scholarly character sheet / Feuille de personnage du jeune chercheur." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/scholarly-character-sheet-feuille-de-personnage-du-jeune-chercheur.
Submitted by Pascal Martinolli on July 24th, 2018
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Comment envoyer une minorité d'étudiants surmotivés sur des objectifs pédagogiques intégrés et connexes dont le parcours est structuré ?
1) Faire une courte introduction engageante (15min.)
2) Identifier la minorité surmotivée et leur distribuer un parcours.
3) Assurer une supervision mininal avec un suivi distant et ponctuel au besoin.
Avec 2 exemples de parcours: une auto-initiation en 5 niveaux pour contribuer à Wikipédia; et un programme de 12 semaines pour démarrer un blogue sur un sujet de recherche.

How to get the few really motivated students involved? By asking them to fulfil « side-quests » learning activities in a structured itinerary :
1) Present a short but engaging initiation [sur quoi?] (15 min.) ;
2) After identifying the motivated students, give them a formal checklist [pour quoi?];
3) If needed, provide minimum mentoring and follow-up
Here are two examples : 5-steps self-initiation on how to contribute to Wikipedia and 12-weeks program to start a blog on research topic.

Learning Outcomes: 

Contributing to Wikipédia and starting a research blog.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 
Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Suggested Citation: 
Martinolli, Pascal. "Missionner les étudiants surmotivés sur des objectifs connexes / Self-driven side-quests with minimum mentoring." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://projectcora.org/assignment/missionner-les-%C3%A9tudiants-surmotiv%C3%A9s-sur-des-objectifs-connexes-self-driven-side-quests.

Pages