Undergraduate / Bachelors

Submitted by Faith Rusk on August 9th, 2019
Short Description: 

This activity helps students collectively practice summarizing, paraphrasing and quoting. To begin, students have a conversation as a class on any topic of their choosing. The instructor transcribes the conversation and then as a group, the class examines the conversation and write summaries, paraphrases and quotes.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Scholarship as Literal Conversation.docxdisplayed 867 times19.17 KB
Sample Transcription & Summary, Paraphrase, & Quote.docxdisplayed 786 times13.15 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to effectively summarize, paraphrase, and quote, using in-text citations

Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This activity can be used in a one-shot library instruction class or by an instructor in a semester long course.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Students are often eager to lead their own discussion, but it they need prompting, don't be afraid to ask probing or follow up questions ("Why do you like hop-hop? What is it you enjoy?") or assign opinions to them, ("So your favorite type of music is show tunes!") to get them to explain why they do or do not like what you've thrown out, or respond instead with an opinion of their own.

Suggested Citation: 
Rusk, Faith. "Scholarship as Literal Conversation." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/scholarship-literal-conversation.
Submitted by Chelsea Nesvig on August 6th, 2019
Short Description: 

This assignment/activity works to pair students in fully online or hybrid courses in order to discuss, via phone or messaging app, any topic of choice. In this example, students in a 100-level composition course discuss their research topic of interest with their partner and offer each other suggestions for refinement. This assignment could be adapted in a variety of ways to support other research assignments or projects.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Project CORA Activity Instructions.docxdisplayed 1172 times17.66 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

After completing this activity students will... - Be able to define their research topic more clearly - Understand that discussing research with each other leads to new/different ideas - Have made a connection with a classmate in an online course that could continue beyond this assignment

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

I have used this activity in both an online and a hybrid (50%) section of an English 102 Research Writing Course. It serves as a way to pair students for research conversations when they are not physically in a classroom together. These pairs could be used throughout the quarter/semester for regular research conversations between students and/or peer-review exercises. This activity is highly adaptable to your teaching context, course, and research assignments. I look forward to hearing how others are able to use it!

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Executing this activity well, especially the first time, can require a good amount of hands on time from the librarian/instructor implementing it. As noted in the assignment description document, pairing students with the Donut app on Slack takes time; using a random pairing generator doesn't take as much. The biggest potential pitfall is students not being able to connect with their partner. Online courses can have students who do not check in regularly enough to allow them to connect with their partner before the due date. I would not penalize students whose partners did not show up. I did pair myself with a student once who didn't have one due to odd numbers in the course.

Suggested Citation: 
Nesvig, Chelsea. "#researchspeeddate (think/pair/share for an online or hybrid class)." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/researchspeeddate-thinkpairshare-online-or-hybrid-class.
Submitted by Melanie Hubbard on July 30th, 2019
Short Description: 

The following are a series of scaffolded assignments that led to the creation of “Labyrinths of Times,” an online digital project: http://labyrinth.english.lmu.build/. Aspects of it, including the scaffolded approach, are helpful for teaching students how to write for the web.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
labyrinth_assignments.docxdisplayed 799 times28.15 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

To teach students how to succinctly articulate complex ideas and write for the web.

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

The assignment was a major project for Paul Harris' course on David Mitchell (ENGL 3998).

Suggested Citation: 
Hubbard, Melanie. "Labyrinths of Time Digital and Writing Project." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/labyrinths-time-digital-and-writing-project.
Submitted by Melanie Hubbard on July 30th, 2019
Short Description: 

This assignment uses Palladio to create a network based on Italio Calvino's Invisible Cities.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
invisible-cities-network_assignment.docxdisplayed 860 times15.58 KB
invisible-cities_network_spreadsheet.txtdisplayed 1920 times16.62 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

The assignment introduces students to network analysis and Palladio as a network analysis tool.

Discipline: 
English

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This assignement was designed for Digital Humanities (ENGL 5998). The course engaged upper-division undergraduate and graduate students in the emerging field of Digital Humanities (DH) through projects grounded in the study and analysis of literary texts.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Suggested Citation: 
Hubbard, Melanie. "Invisible Cities Network Analysis Assignment ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/invisible-cities-network-analysis-assignment.
Submitted by Melanie Hubbard on July 30th, 2019
Short Description: 

An introduction to Voyant text analysis tool.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
voyant-introduction_assignment .docxdisplayed 1105 times20.88 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

The intention of this assignment is to teach students how to use and be critical of Voyant, a text analysis tool.

Discipline: 
English

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This assignement was designed for Digital Humanities (ENGL 5998). The course engaged upper-division undergraduate and graduate students in the emerging field of Digital Humanities (DH) through projects grounded in the study and analysis of literary texts.

Suggested Citation: 
Hubbard, Melanie. "Introduction to Voyant Assignment." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/introduction-voyant-assignment.
Submitted by Lindsay Davis on July 12th, 2019
Short Description: 

A "jigsaw lite" activity to help students recognize that the information tools and systems they use in their everyday and academic lives are not neutral as existing power structures are reflected in the creation, organization, and access of information. Students work in small groups to read an assigned article about bias in a tool, source type, or system and answer questions to share with the larger class.

Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to recognize that search tools and systems reflect power structures of race, gender, sexuality, class, etc.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This lesson and activity was designed for an upper-division Critical Race and Ethnic Studies (CRES) course, CRES 101 Race and the Media. While students didn’t need to include outside research for their media analysis assignment, due to the theme of the class, the graduate assistant and I felt that adding this layer of complexity would further contribute to students’ understanding of bias in knowledge creation, which is a unit covered in the course. After introducing the lesson using Polkinghorne's visualization and sharing the PBS NewsHour video, I divided students into six groups of five students. Each group read their assigned article, discussed and answered the discussion questions, and then reported what they learned to the class. While I link the articles on the online class guide, I also bring enough printed copies of the articles. For printing, I have found that it is easier to copy-paste the text of the articles into Microsoft Word / Google Docs. Although I included a handout with the discussion questions here in Project CORA, in class, I actually display the questions on the online class guide and have students write their answers on a large sticky note, which I provide, along with markers.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

You may need to ask probing questions when students report their findings to the class. It can be helpful to remind students that not everyone has read the same article, so they need to provide enough information for classmates to understand the gist of the article. Though the general discussion questions allow for quick facilitation, which is helpful when swapping out articles for newer ones, you may want to develop more specific questions for each article. More targeted questions can help students focus on the most relevant parts of the reading. The articles will age quickly, so it's important to be on the lookout for short articles related to these issues. I have found that articles that fit on two pages in Microsoft Word / Google Docs work best for students to be able to read in class. True jigsaws can be challenging for a variety of instruction types, which is why I opted for in-person class reading in which students stayed in their groups and reported out their answers and thoughts to their classmates. This also helps combat anxiety students may feel about reading in a timed setting as they have others in their group who can help answer questions if they don't quite finish the article. There are many ways this lesson and activity can be adapted; it could work very well in a flipped setting, for example.

Suggested Citation: 
Davis, Lindsay. "Bias in Your Search Results." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/bias-your-search-results.
Submitted by Peter Catlin on July 10th, 2019
Short Description: 

A classroom activity and lesson plan for first-year students. Your students will learn to differentiate between different categories of items -- such as Popular/Scholarly, or Primary/Secondary/Tertiary -- by playing this fun and easy game.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
The Sorting Machine - lesson plan.pdfdisplayed 1804 times567.85 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will:
• Correctly categorize library items.
• Describe the different role that each category plays in the research process.
• Discuss how particular items could be used in the research process, in the context of each item’s category.

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Catlin, Peter. "The Sorting Machine." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/sorting-machine.
Submitted by Zoeanna Mayhook on June 19th, 2019
Short Description: 

This worksheet asks students to reflect on the type of primary law relevant to their legal research topic, as well as ask them to consider the levels of government, possible keywords, and preferred time period (current versus historical).

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Legal Research Worksheet.docxdisplayed 952 times24.23 KB
Legal Research Powerpoint 2019.pptxdisplayed 1234 times2.81 MB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to define their information scope, and develop a legal research strategy.

Discipline: 
Law

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Worksheet may be handed out after a presentation that defines different types of primary law, and government levels.

Suggested Citation: 
Mayhook, Zoeanna. "Legal Research: Preliminary Analysis Worksheet ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/legal-research-preliminary-analysis-worksheet.
Submitted by Zoeanna Mayhook on June 16th, 2019
Short Description: 

Research Resources the card game is an information literacy activity adapted from Apples to Apples game rules. Players write down their research topics, and their teammates suggest resources based on gold resource cards they have been dealt. Attached are the game instructions, cards, and discussion questions.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Research Resources - Instructions.docxdisplayed 1098 times104.52 KB
Research Resources - Gold Template Cards Sample Pack.docxdisplayed 1005 times447.24 KB
Research Resources - Gold Template Cards Blank.docxdisplayed 874 times260.65 KB
Research Resources - Purple Template Cards Blank.docxdisplayed 822 times268.77 KB
Research Resources - Discussion Questions.docxdisplayed 943 times31.49 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to develop the scope of their research topic, and match information needs to appropriate resources

Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Game was developed for a multidisciplinary writing class. Game could be adapted to focus on specific subjects or disciplines.

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Mayhook, Zoeanna. "Research Resources: The Card Game ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/research-resources-card-game.
Submitted by Carolyn Caffrey on June 13th, 2019
Short Description: 

This lesson is designed for lower-division composition undergraduate students to learn frameworks for evaluating the audience and purpose of various information sources. After analyzing an array of sources for audience and purpose students can dig in to a source in more detail looking for markers of authority and discussing strategies for verifying claims.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Audience and purpose concept mapdisplayed 2130 times82.87 KB
Evaluating a Source Worksheetdisplayed 1401 times8.94 KB
Slides for Studentsdisplayed 2514 times432.21 KB
Lesson plan outline and pictures of research stationsdisplayed 1733 times564.85 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to:
1) Articulate different markers of authority in a variety of information contexts
2) Identify the purpose and audience of different information formats

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This lesson plan was designed for 60 minutes and delivered to 42 classes in 6 days as part of a summer early start composition program. We needed something that was fun, interactive, could be delivered by many different instructors back to back, and supported the overall course goals of reading rhetorically.

Prior to teaching the lesson we assembled six self contained "research stations." These were boxes (but could also be dedicated spaces) filled with information sources with various audiences/purposes, worksheets to be completed in small groups, stickers to make the worksheets faster, and writing utensils.

The librarian begins the lesson with a warm-up question on everyday research, this is followed by a group map and discussion on the audience and purpose of information sources, finally the session concludes with an in-depth dive evaluating one popular source.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Pictures of our research stations are included in the PDF lesson plan. We used the following sources in our boxes:
• #1 Multimodal news piece: https://highline.huffingtonpost.com/articles/en/poor-millennials/
• #2 an opposing viewpoints opinion piece from a Marijuana policy institute [proxied link removed – sub in your own opinion piece here]
• #3 a news article: https://ktla.com/2019/05/29/contractors-like-uber-lyft-drivers-would-get...
• #4 a video: https://www.ted.com/talks/angela_lee_duckworth_grit_the_power_of_passion...
• # 5 a government report from a website: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/mental-illness.shtml
• # 6 a scholarly journal article [proxied link removed – sub in your own short article here]
• #7 an encyclopedia article from Gale Virtual Reference
• #8 an edited scholarly monograph on a variety of topics pulled from our stacks

Assessment or Criteria for Success
Assessment Short Description: 
We used a short evaluation form designed for this session. The questions included: 1) Which part of today's session did you learn the most from? {checkbox of all the activities and components] 2) What was one aha! moment that you had today about understanding and evaluating sources? 3) If you could change or improve one thing about this session to better help you learn, what would it be? We also consulted with faculty teaching the course regarding their student work.
Suggested Citation: 
Caffrey, Carolyn . "Mapping Audience & Purpose: Evaluating Sources." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/mapping-audience-purpose-evaluating-sources.

Pages