Women's and Gender Studies

Submitted by Elisa Acosta on May 15th, 2026
Short Description: 

This self-guided, active learning exercise for Zotero was originally created for a 1–1.5 hour standalone online workshop. Zotero is a free, open-source tool that helps users collect, organize, annotate, cite, and share references. It is easy enough for students to learn quickly, yet powerful enough to support dissertations, theses, and capstone projects. Zotero also provides a practical way to engage with the conceptual goals of the ACRL Framework, transforming abstract ideas such as “giving credit” and “joining a scholarly conversation” into concrete research practices.

The lesson plan focuses on importing sources related to “food insecurity” and “college students” into Zotero, correcting citation metadata, creating a quick bibliography, and generating a formatted bibliography in Microsoft Word using Zotero’s Word add-in. Students are provided with step-by-step instructions and supporting resources throughout each stage of the activity.

The exercise includes the following components:

  • Part 1: Practice Importing to Zotero.
  • Part 2: Practice: Correcting the Metadata.
  • Part 3: Creating a Quick Bibliography in Zotero.
  • Part 4: Citing and Creating a Bibliography in Word.

A sample research paper for Part 4 is available in both Microsoft Word and Google Docs formats.

Answer keys are provided in APA style.

A 15-minute instructional video covering Parts 1–3 is currently available. A second video covering Part 4 is in development.

Learning Outcomes: 
  1. Students will import citations from library databases and websites into a Zotero folder.
  2. Students will generate a bibliography in a specific citation style using Zotero.
  3. Students will create in-text citations using Microsoft Word integration feature.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Option 1 (Original format):
The first standalone online workshop was offered in 2022. An optional drop-in help session for Zotero installation was held at 4:00 p.m., followed by the workshop at 4:30 p.m. Students registered via Zoom and received access to the self-guided active learning exercise in advance. The session was delivered synchronously, with pauses after Parts 2, 3, and 4 for guided student practice. The workshop lasted approximately 1.5 hours.

Option 2 (Asynchronous implementation):

The Summer Undergraduate Research Program (SURP) requested an asynchronous version of the workshop. The self-guided exercise was embedded in a LibGuide and integrated into a Blackboard (LMS) course.

Option 3 (Hybrid delivery):

The workshop was split into two one-hour sessions. The first session was an online presentation, followed by a second, in-person session in the library classroom. Students brought laptops for hands-on practice, and librarians provided installation support and Zotero troubleshooting during the in-person session.

Option 4 (Current version):

The current model is a one-hour standalone online workshop. Librarians demonstrate Zotero with brief pauses for questions rather than in-session practice activities. Students may complete the active learning exercise independently after the session or remain in the Zoom room to begin working. A second librarian provides Zotero installation support and troubleshooting in a breakout room. The optional installation help session now occurs after the workshop rather than before. This structure has improved flow, and students report preferring to see the full demonstration before deciding whether to adopt Zotero.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Zotero LibGuide https://libguides.lmu.edu/zotero/workshop

Create a Zotero account https://www.zotero.org/

We now demonstrate ZoteroBib https://zbib.org/   (Education students, K-12 teachers, and parents like it)

Assessment or Criteria for Success
Assessment Short Description: 
Students use the answer key for self-assessment by comparing their completed bibliography to the provided example. This process reinforces the importance of accurate metadata correction. Note: Asynchronous participants complete Parts 1–3. Part 4 is optional until a corresponding instructional video is available.
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

This workshop format is most effective with two librarians, one to lead instruction and one to monitor Zoom chat and respond to questions. After the session, one librarian remains in the main room while the other provides Zotero installation troubleshooting in a breakout room. (Sometimes more liaison librarians attend for additional graduate student support)

While attendees are encouraged to install Zotero prior to the workshop, installation issues are common. Offering technical support after the presentation, rather than before, has proven to be more effective.

All instructional materials currently use APA style. In the future we would like to offer the self-guided active learning exercise in both MLA Style and Chicago Style.

Updates to both Zotero and the library’s discovery tool have required revisions to instructional materials.

Online workshops consistently attract higher attendance than in-person sessions. Participants often include undergraduate students, graduate students, faculty, and staff. Workshops are typically scheduled between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., most often on Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday evenings.

Suggested Citation: 
Acosta, Elisa. "Citations in the Wild: Wrangling Your Citations with Zotero." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2026. https://projectcora.org/assignment/citations-wild-wrangling-your-citations-zotero.
Submitted by Lauren deLaubell on January 17th, 2025
Short Description: 

The most powerful wizards have gathered to battle one another.  Only one will win.  Wizards must use reliable sources to research incantations for the battle, or their spells will fizzle.  Truly wise wizards must learn to tell the difference. 

Research Wizards is an information literacy card game designed to teach students ages 12+ about source evaluation.  Research Wizards corresponds to the Frame Authority Is Constructed and Contextual, from the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education.  Players will discuss and challenge the relative value of various sources, each representing a different suit in the game.  The game includes four major actions/phases:  Parley, when players discuss and decide for themselves the relative value of each suit; Battle, which includes competition, player actions, and Challenges; Vengeance, for eliminated players to impact and speed up the remainder of the game; and Victory.

The Research Wizards website contains free game files, player directions, and printing tips for librarians and teachers who wish to use the game in their classrooms.  The website includes an editable, Microsoft Publisher version of the game.  Noncommercial use of the game is free for educational purposes with attribution to the author.  Librarians and teachers are encouraged to adapt the game as needed for their subject areas, student needs, and as the sources in the game evolve over time.  Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.

Players:  3-5 per deck

Play Time:  20-30 minutes, plus discussion

This work was primarily human-created. Adobe Firefly AI was used to generate icons. AI was prompted for its contributions, then reviewed, edited, and approved by the author.

Research Wizards by Lauren deLaubell is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0  To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Player directionsdisplayed 1902 times1.02 MB
Printing tipsdisplayed 1712 times26.71 KB
Card deckdisplayed 1942 times2.51 MB
Learning Outcomes: 
    • Wizards will define a variety of traditional and emerging information formats.
    • Wizards will compare a variety of information formats and discuss their relative reliability.
    • Wizards will explore the variation in quality found within specific categories of information (e.g., the wildcard of using resources located by or generated with artificial intelligence).

Individual or Group:

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

It is recommended to review directions out loud with students, with pauses for students to sort their decks and conduct the Parley phase of play.  To contextualize and reinforce learning, it is recommended to conclude the game with discussion questions; sample questions are provided at the bottom of the player directions file but may be adjusted as needed.

Suggested Citation: 
deLaubell, Lauren. "Research Wizards." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2025. https://projectcora.org/assignment/research-wizards.
Submitted by Sarah Hartman-Caverly on August 4th, 2023
Short Description: 

This sex-positive privacy literacy workshop engages participants in exploring how sex tech impacts intimate privacy and intimate relationships. Workshop content is contextualized with the theoretical frameworks of artificial intimacies (Brooks) and consentful tech (The Consentful Tech Project) and the concept of intimate privacy (Citron) and presented through a privacy literacy lens. Participants will identify artificial intimacies in order to assess real-world examples and their impact upon intimate privacy; evaluate the privacy of digital bodies under conditions of data promiscuity using a consentful tech framework; and understand intimate privacy and the impact of technology on intimate relationships and wellbeing.

The workshop is designed for a 60-minute session, but can be extended to fill the time available.
Includes workshop guide, presentation slides, learning activities, inclusive pedagogy tool, and assessment instrument.

Learning Outcomes: 
  1. Identify artificial intimacies in order to assess real-world examples and their impact upon intimate privacy
  2. Evaluate the privacy of digital bodies under conditions of data promiscuity using a consentful tech framework
  3. Understand intimate privacy and the impact of technology on intimate relationships and wellbeing.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 
Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Hartman-Caverly, Sarah. "Private Bits: Privacy, Intimacy, and Consent." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2023. https://projectcora.org/assignment/private-bits-privacy-intimacy-and-consent.
Submitted by Kendall Faulkner on July 14th, 2021
Short Description: 

Annotated bibliographies have become a popular assignment in college courses and a way to scaffold research papers. Gathering a bibliography before turning in a completed research project allows students to focus on searching strategically and get feedback on the sources they obtained. Annotating that bibliography requires them to think critically about the sources they choose and their relationship to the research at hand. While there are numerous guides and examples that show students the format of an annotation, there are very few that connect annotations to research questions or guide students through making those connections. This lesson plan Uses Joseph Bizup’s BEAM Method from the realm of rhetoric studies to help students think about how sources are used and adds an additional layer of support. This support bridges the gap between a student recognizing a source is generally related to their topic, and thinking critically about how that source is used to answer a research question. 

 

Bizup, Joseph. "BEAM: A rhetorical vocabulary for teaching research-based writing." Rhetoric Review 27, no. 1 (2008): 72-86.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Handout_AnnotatedBibActivity.docxdisplayed 1577 times20.4 KB
Lesson Plan_Annotated Bibliographies with BEAM.docxdisplayed 1520 times11.99 KB
Slides_BEAMAnnotated Bibliographies.pptxdisplayed 1707 times3.49 MB
Sample Annotated Bibliography-Accessible.docxdisplayed 1129 times23.93 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
    • Describe the purpose and structure of an annotated bibliography

    • Analyze an information source for its ability to help answer a research question and articulate that in an annotation. 

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This lesson was developed for a History course, and has also worked well in Ethnic and Area Studies classes. 

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

The class activity works best when using an assigned source (book, article, primary source, etc.) the students have already read/viewed as part of the class. If you don’t have that option, a book review can be a good stand in and even help students consider how to assess sources before reading them. Alternatively, or a short article or primary source can be used.

Suggested Citation: 
Faulkner, Kendall . "Annotated Bibliographies: Shining a Light on Source Evaluation with the BEAM Method." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/annotated-bibliographies-shining-light-source-evaluation-beam-method.
Submitted by Hillary Richardson on April 21st, 2021
Short Description: 

This assignment was created to help undergraduate students use research articles to help inform their argument about a "text."  This exercise has been used in library instruction sessions for art history, composition, english literature, women's studies, and history classes. After reflecting on what they know about a text (or image or multimedia), brainstorming search terms, and tracking relevant patterns in search results, students can synthesize information from a variety of sources in an organized, methodological fashion. 

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Research Matrix Exercise.pptxdisplayed 1542 times111.33 KB
Research Matrix_handout.docxdisplayed 1294 times369.2 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to brainstorm and refine research topics by brainstorming search terms, identifying relevant resources, and charting related topics

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This lesson was originally created to assist with organizing ideas and sources for a literature review, but was edited to simplify objectives and condense the lesson for shorter assignments 

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

See attached files

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

This can be done for individual students or in small groups. In addition to sending this document directly to students (either as a file or in a printed handout), create separate Google docs (or some other interactive document platform) for them to work in together. 

Suggested Citation: 
Richardson, Hillary. "Research matrix: synthesizing search results." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/research-matrix-synthesizing-search-results.
Submitted by Liz Bellamy on June 11th, 2020
Short Description: 

When writing a research paper, it can be easy to overlook the human side of scholarship – how being cited in a study (or not) can have real, material consequences, and how social structures can systematically exclude certain people from scholarship. This activity and lesson explores these ideas and gives students strategies for making their literature reviews more inclusive.

All told, this lesson takes about 50 minutes to an hour -- 20-30 minutes for the readings and pre-workshop activity, and 30 minutes of discussion. 

AttachmentSize
Inclusive citations outline and lesson plan.docxdisplayed 1545 times20.47 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • Students will be able to articular some of the material consequences of citation practices in scholarly and research fields.
  • Students will be able to identify baseline strategies for practicing inclusive citation in their fields of study.
  • Students will be able to consider alternative sources of authority in their fields of study.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This flipped-classroom workshop was first implemented in an extracurricular summer undergraduate workshop series. It was one of many topics offered in the series, and meant to complement topics such as "Finding Full-Text Articles" and "Writing a Literature Review." The workshop has been held virtually over Blackboard and Zoom, though it can certainly be adapted to an in-person setting. 

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Readings:

1: Maha Bali, Inclusive Citation: How Diverse Are Your References?

2: Rachel Pells, Understanding the Extent of Gender Gap in Citation 

Activity:

1. After finishing the readings, complete the following activity analyzing the citation practices of a research paper of your  choice. Choose either:

  1. your own literature review up to this point, or
  2. a scholarly article you’re considering for your literature review.

Your task is to briefly analyze the gender dynamics of your chosen research paper's works cited page (up to 20 sources, max). Based on what you can infer of the genders of the authors cited, what do you notice? Is there a balance or imbalance of gender among the authors cited? 

2. Respond to this discussion board post with what you noticed during your analysis and what any gender gap or lack thereof says to you about whose voices are valued in your field. 

Instructor's note: In order to remain manageable, this activity asked students to make assumptions about gender based on superficial characteristics and sort those genders largely into a binary. Some brief classroom time was spent unpacking how, in reality, gender is a complex spectrum. 

Suggested Citation: 
Bellamy, Liz . "Whose Shoulders Are You Standing On? Inclusive Citation Practices in Literature Reviews." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://projectcora.org/assignment/whose-shoulders-are-you-standing-inclusive-citation-practices-literature-reviews.
Submitted by Aisha Conner-Gaten on January 22nd, 2020
Short Description: 

This workshop introduces zines to a First Year Women's and Gender Studies class including what they are, general history and culture in the United States, and the process of making zines. This workshop supported a class assignment where students make zines featuring class readings and a reflective essay including original creative works. In the sessions, students recieve "handout" zines for note-taking and reflective work, a short lecture on zines, and work with databases to find pieces for their zine topics or ideas. The instructor can find example zines for the interactive exercise on Internet Archive and other collections.

Learning Outcomes: 
  • Students will know the basics of zines as cultural and reflective documents in order to determine social value
  • Students will analyze zines for cultural and social impact and themes in order to recreate zines with their topics
  • Students will employ database searches in order to find and evaluate pieces for zine assignment

Individual or Group:

Tags:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

The course assignment for this workshop focused on the creation of the zine specifically incorporating previous course readings, essays, creative works, and organizational research. In support of this, the library workshop on zines introduced to idea of zines, showed examples with partner question work, and research time to explore subject databases for relevant articles and images.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Time! Consider shortening zine handout to provide more time to create or work on individual zines. Perhaps even make a blank version with minimal illustration.

Suggested Citation: 
Conner-Gaten, Aisha. "Zine Workshop." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://projectcora.org/assignment/zine-workshop.
Submitted by Pascal Martinolli on November 8th, 2019
Short Description: 

An open access MOOC in French to bonify the information literacy skills of university students (with Moodle).

Learning Outcomes: 

Students will know how to identify references in a bibliography, how to define their research subjects (synonyms & thesaurus), how to combine their keywords, which service to use (catalog, database, Google,...), how to assess the credibility of their sources, how to cite and respect copyrights, how to produce a bibliography with Zotero, how to adopt good practices for publishing (publishing process, open access, predators), how to set up alerts on topics, and what are bibliometry and literature review.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Integrated completely or partially into undergraduate and graduate courses. Also used as support to upgrade a specific information literacy skill of a student after a reference interview.

Assessment or Criteria for Success
Assessment Short Description: 
Each module is assessed by a 10 questions test.
Suggested Citation: 
Martinolli, Pascal. "MOOC BoniCI ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/mooc-bonici.
Submitted by Amanda M. on April 12th, 2019
Short Description: 

Each year, I host an Art+Feminism Wikipedia edit-a-thon and I often get students who are new to Wikipedia editing, as well as students who show up for class credit. To help engage students in different activities on Wikipedia, I created the following BINGO cards. These can be used by instructors or event organizers in any way that fits your approach to edit-a-thons. I always provide instruction and an Art+Feminism research and event guide to help everyone get started editing. These BINGO cards are especially useful for new editors and content creators.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Wikipedia bingo small.pdfdisplayed 1941 times181.88 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will build skills and knowledge in the variety of ways that they can improve Wikipedia pages.

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
M., Amanda. "Wikipedia Edit-a-thon BINGO." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/wikipedia-edit-thon-bingo.
Submitted by Beth Hoppe on February 18th, 2019
Short Description: 

This activity provides an interactive, student-centered, fun opportunity to explore skills of critical thinking and evaluation of resources. By allowing students to connect those things that they already know (even if they don’t know they know it) to larger concepts, we encourage them to trust themselves and to begin to develop their intuition as scholars, moving away from checklists and formulas for resource evaluation and toward a thoughtful critique of sources based on individual need and use.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Sphere of Discourse: What, how-to, why, etc.displayed 2190 times16.97 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Describe different sources of information
Articulate benefits/drawbacks of information sources
Consider information as influence
Investigate role of various media in different forms of "conversation" (scholarly, popular, etc)
Define library spaces/terminology/sources

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

The Sphere of Discourse works well in courses that may traditionally get an orientation to the library. It can be modified to work for specific disciplines or contexts.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

This activity requires space!

Suggested Citation: 
Hoppe, Beth. "Sphere of Discourse." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2019. https://projectcora.org/assignment/sphere-discourse.

Pages