Library and Information Science

Submitted by Elisa Acosta on May 15th, 2026
Short Description: 

This self-guided, active learning exercise for Zotero was originally created for a 1–1.5 hour standalone online workshop. Zotero is a free, open-source tool that helps users collect, organize, annotate, cite, and share references. It is easy enough for students to learn quickly, yet powerful enough to support dissertations, theses, and capstone projects. Zotero also provides a practical way to engage with the conceptual goals of the ACRL Framework, transforming abstract ideas such as “giving credit” and “joining a scholarly conversation” into concrete research practices.

The lesson plan focuses on importing sources related to “food insecurity” and “college students” into Zotero, correcting citation metadata, creating a quick bibliography, and generating a formatted bibliography in Microsoft Word using Zotero’s Word add-in. Students are provided with step-by-step instructions and supporting resources throughout each stage of the activity.

The exercise includes the following components:

  • Part 1: Practice Importing to Zotero.
  • Part 2: Practice: Correcting the Metadata.
  • Part 3: Creating a Quick Bibliography in Zotero.
  • Part 4: Citing and Creating a Bibliography in Word.

A sample research paper for Part 4 is available in both Microsoft Word and Google Docs formats.

Answer keys are provided in APA style.

A 15-minute instructional video covering Parts 1–3 is currently available. A second video covering Part 4 is in development.

Learning Outcomes: 
  1. Students will import citations from library databases and websites into a Zotero folder.
  2. Students will generate a bibliography in a specific citation style using Zotero.
  3. Students will create in-text citations using Microsoft Word integration feature.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Option 1 (Original format):
The first standalone online workshop was offered in 2022. An optional drop-in help session for Zotero installation was held at 4:00 p.m., followed by the workshop at 4:30 p.m. Students registered via Zoom and received access to the self-guided active learning exercise in advance. The session was delivered synchronously, with pauses after Parts 2, 3, and 4 for guided student practice. The workshop lasted approximately 1.5 hours.

Option 2 (Asynchronous implementation):

The Summer Undergraduate Research Program (SURP) requested an asynchronous version of the workshop. The self-guided exercise was embedded in a LibGuide and integrated into a Blackboard (LMS) course.

Option 3 (Hybrid delivery):

The workshop was split into two one-hour sessions. The first session was an online presentation, followed by a second, in-person session in the library classroom. Students brought laptops for hands-on practice, and librarians provided installation support and Zotero troubleshooting during the in-person session.

Option 4 (Current version):

The current model is a one-hour standalone online workshop. Librarians demonstrate Zotero with brief pauses for questions rather than in-session practice activities. Students may complete the active learning exercise independently after the session or remain in the Zoom room to begin working. A second librarian provides Zotero installation support and troubleshooting in a breakout room. The optional installation help session now occurs after the workshop rather than before. This structure has improved flow, and students report preferring to see the full demonstration before deciding whether to adopt Zotero.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Zotero LibGuide https://libguides.lmu.edu/zotero/workshop

Create a Zotero account https://www.zotero.org/

We now demonstrate ZoteroBib https://zbib.org/   (Education students, K-12 teachers, and parents like it)

Assessment or Criteria for Success
Assessment Short Description: 
Students use the answer key for self-assessment by comparing their completed bibliography to the provided example. This process reinforces the importance of accurate metadata correction. Note: Asynchronous participants complete Parts 1–3. Part 4 is optional until a corresponding instructional video is available.
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

This workshop format is most effective with two librarians, one to lead instruction and one to monitor Zoom chat and respond to questions. After the session, one librarian remains in the main room while the other provides Zotero installation troubleshooting in a breakout room. (Sometimes more liaison librarians attend for additional graduate student support)

While attendees are encouraged to install Zotero prior to the workshop, installation issues are common. Offering technical support after the presentation, rather than before, has proven to be more effective.

All instructional materials currently use APA style. In the future we would like to offer the self-guided active learning exercise in both MLA Style and Chicago Style.

Updates to both Zotero and the library’s discovery tool have required revisions to instructional materials.

Online workshops consistently attract higher attendance than in-person sessions. Participants often include undergraduate students, graduate students, faculty, and staff. Workshops are typically scheduled between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., most often on Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday evenings.

Suggested Citation: 
Acosta, Elisa. "Citations in the Wild: Wrangling Your Citations with Zotero." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2026. https://projectcora.org/assignment/citations-wild-wrangling-your-citations-zotero.
Submitted by Susan Archambault on May 5th, 2026
Short Description: 

This is a test short description. blah bhal blah.

  • Comment 1
  • Comment 2
  • Comment 3
  • Comment 4
  1. Comment 5
  2. Comment 6
  3. Comment 7
Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
CMST3180Fall2025.pptxdisplayed 52 times3.45 MB
Introduction Slides Only.pdfdisplayed 45 times365.56 KB
Outline CMST 3180.docxdisplayed 36 times16.54 KB
AttachmentSize
Outline CMST 3180.docxdisplayed 36 times16.54 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  1. 1. Blah blah
  2. 2. blah blah blah
  • Spacing 1
  • Spacing 2

Bolded

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

blah blah blah

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

blah blah blah

https://library.lmu.edu

Assessment or Criteria for Success
(e.g. rubric, guidelines, exemplary sample paper, etc.): 
AttachmentSize
Outline CMST 3180.docxdisplayed 36 times16.54 KB
Assessment Short Description: 
blah blah blah
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

blah blah blah!

Suggested Citation: 
Archambault, Susan. "This is a Test Title." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2026. https://projectcora.org/assignment/test-title.

Teaching Resource

Over 60 practical assignment prompts and ideas across disciplines to assist with teaching skills for using ChatGPT (and other AI tools), including prompt engineering, evaluating output, analyzing texts, writing, generating content, studying, and c

Submitted by Lauren deLaubell on January 17th, 2025
Short Description: 

The most powerful wizards have gathered to battle one another.  Only one will win.  Wizards must use reliable sources to research incantations for the battle, or their spells will fizzle.  Truly wise wizards must learn to tell the difference. 

Research Wizards is an information literacy card game designed to teach students ages 12+ about source evaluation.  Research Wizards corresponds to the Frame Authority Is Constructed and Contextual, from the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education.  Players will discuss and challenge the relative value of various sources, each representing a different suit in the game.  The game includes four major actions/phases:  Parley, when players discuss and decide for themselves the relative value of each suit; Battle, which includes competition, player actions, and Challenges; Vengeance, for eliminated players to impact and speed up the remainder of the game; and Victory.

The Research Wizards website contains free game files, player directions, and printing tips for librarians and teachers who wish to use the game in their classrooms.  The website includes an editable, Microsoft Publisher version of the game.  Noncommercial use of the game is free for educational purposes with attribution to the author.  Librarians and teachers are encouraged to adapt the game as needed for their subject areas, student needs, and as the sources in the game evolve over time.  Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.

Players:  3-5 per deck

Play Time:  20-30 minutes, plus discussion

This work was primarily human-created. Adobe Firefly AI was used to generate icons. AI was prompted for its contributions, then reviewed, edited, and approved by the author.

Research Wizards by Lauren deLaubell is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0  To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Player directionsdisplayed 1906 times1.02 MB
Printing tipsdisplayed 1714 times26.71 KB
Card deckdisplayed 1947 times2.51 MB
Learning Outcomes: 
    • Wizards will define a variety of traditional and emerging information formats.
    • Wizards will compare a variety of information formats and discuss their relative reliability.
    • Wizards will explore the variation in quality found within specific categories of information (e.g., the wildcard of using resources located by or generated with artificial intelligence).

Individual or Group:

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

It is recommended to review directions out loud with students, with pauses for students to sort their decks and conduct the Parley phase of play.  To contextualize and reinforce learning, it is recommended to conclude the game with discussion questions; sample questions are provided at the bottom of the player directions file but may be adjusted as needed.

Suggested Citation: 
deLaubell, Lauren. "Research Wizards." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2025. https://projectcora.org/assignment/research-wizards.
Submitted by Ariel Dyer on November 18th, 2024
Short Description: 

Play-based learning activity asking students to intentionally create "fake news" and engage with their emotional reactions in coming across information. 

Learning Outcomes: 
  • Evaluate news using the SIFT rubric
  • Select relevant misinformation tools and apply to misleading information
  • Create misinformation in order to understand its proliferation

Individual or Group:

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Recommendations for adaptation:

  • -Prior introduction to AI tools
  • -Stronger parameters for discussion post (set the scene)
Suggested Citation: 
Dyer, Ariel. "Faking Breaking News." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2024. https://projectcora.org/assignment/faking-breaking-news.
Submitted by Andrea Brooks on October 14th, 2024
Short Description: 

Two librarians at NKU developed an Informed Voting workshop to help students navigate information during the 2024 election season. Attendees were provided a worksheet to learn about the candidates/issues on their ballot and dig into one issue/race to investigate during the workshop.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Voting Workshop Plandisplayed 735 times36.13 KB
Voting Workshop Slidesdisplayed 823 times2.95 MB
Voter Workshop Worksheetdisplayed 737 times25.1 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
Locate voter information to identify who and what is on their ballot
Use relevant and credible news sources to make informed voting decisions

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This was a workshop designed for our campus community and open for anyone, though marketing targeted the student population. We are also considering how to offer this workshop as an option for a class.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Brooks, Andrea. "Voter Workshop." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2024. https://projectcora.org/assignment/voter-workshop.

Teaching Resource

Informationliteracy.gov disseminates successful practices, tools, and programs related to financial, health, digital, and other information literacy subject areas.

Submitted by Shelby Hallman on March 26th, 2024
Short Description: 

Algorithms are everywhere, and they have increasing power over what we consume (Amazon, Netflix, TikTok), who we date (“the apps”), and how we understand the world (Google, ChatGPT). So, what are algorithms, and how did they become so powerful? Who are the humans that create them, and why does it matter?

In this workshop, we will explore how algorithms can perpetuate bias and discrimination, and discuss some preventive strategies. It is open to learners of all backgrounds and experience.

Workshop Instructors: Shelby Hallman, Physical Sciences and Engineering Librarian; Ashley Peterson, Research & Instruction Librarian, Media and Data Literacy; Alexandra Solodkaya, Rothman Family Food Studies Librarian

Credits: This workshop was derived from LMU's Rise Against the Machines: Understanding Algorithmic Bias workshop. 

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
UCLA_SRW_Fall23 Algorithmic Bias Workshop Slide Deck.pdfdisplayed 1518 times3.75 MB
Algo_Bias_UCLA_Fall_23_Lesson Plan.pdfdisplayed 1252 times83.65 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • Students will be introduced to algorithmic bias concepts, focusing on machine learning and AI.
  • Students will understand the causes and implications of bias within algorithm development and use. 
  • Students will discuss strategies to cope with or critically engage with algorithms.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This workshop was held virtually, via Zoom. 

Assessment or Criteria for Success
Assessment Short Description: 
Formative assessment was conducted via the in-session activities and participation. Summative assessment was conducted via an end of session survey form.
Suggested Citation: 
Hallman, Shelby. "Breaking the Code: Understanding Algorithmic Bias." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2024. https://projectcora.org/assignment/breaking-code-understanding-algorithmic-bias.
Submitted by Sarah Hartman-Caverly on December 20th, 2023
Short Description: 

The Hidden Layer Workshop introduces key generative AI (genAI) concepts through a privacy lens. Participants probe the possibilities and limitations of genAI while considering implications for intellectual privacy, intellectual property, data sovereignty, and human agency. In the centerpiece activity, participants engage in a hidden layer simulation to develop a conceptual understanding of the algorithms in the neural networks underlying LLMs and their implications for machine bias and AI hallucination. Drawing on Richards’s theory of intellectual privacy (2015) and the movement for data sovereignty, and introducing an original framework for the ethical evaluation of AI, Hidden Layer prepares participants to be critical users of genAI and synthetic media.

The workshop is designed for a 60-minute session, but can be extended to fill the time available.
Includes workshop guide, presentation slides, learning activities, and assessment instrument.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
HiddenLayer_LessonPlan_CCBYSA_HartmanCaverly_2023.pdfdisplayed 1796 times117.63 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Facilitator learning objectives

During this workshop, participants will

  • Apply prompt engineering techniques to elicit information from text-to-text generative AI (genAI) platforms

  • Appreciate a range of intellectual privacy implications posed by genAI, including: 

    • personal data;

    • intellectual property (copyright, patent, proprietary and sensitive data); 

    • AI alignment (social bias, content moderation, AI guardrails, censorship, prompt injection); 

    • synthetic media;

    • AI hallucination and mis/dis/malinformation; and

    • data sovereignty and data colonialism.

  • Engage in a simulation to develop a conceptual understanding of how the hidden layer in the neural networks underpinning large language models works

  • Synthesize their knowledge of genAI intellectual privacy considerations to analyze an ethical case study using the Agent-Impact Matrix for Artificial Intelligence (AIM4AI).

Participant learning outcomes

During this workshop, participants will

  • Interact with genAI to explore its possibilities and limitations

  • Discuss the intellectual privacy implications of genAI, including intellectual property considerations

  • Evaluate the ethics of genAI for its impact on human agency

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Hartman-Caverly, Sarah. "Hidden Layer: Intellectual Privacy and Generative AI." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2023. https://projectcora.org/assignment/hidden-layer-intellectual-privacy-and-generative-ai.
Submitted by Sarah Hartman-Caverly on August 4th, 2023
Short Description: 

This workshop engages participants in exploring corporate data collection, personal profiling, deceptive design, and data brokerage practices. Workshop content is contextualized with the theoretical frameworks of panoptic sort (Gandy), surveillance capitalism (Zuboff), and the four regulators (Lessig) and presented through a privacy and business ethics lens. Participants will learn how companies make money from data collection practices; explore how interface design can influence our choices and behaviors; and discuss business ethics regarding privacy and big data.
The workshop is designed for 75-minute class sessions, but can be compressed into 60-minute sessions.
Includes workshop guide, presentation slides, learning activities, and assessment instrument.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
DarkPatternsWorkshopLessonPlan_HartmanCaverly_CCBYNCSA.pdfdisplayed 1386 times84.44 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  1. Learn how companies make money from data collection practices
  2. Explore how interface design can influence our choices and behaviors
  3. Discuss business ethics regarding privacy and big data.

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Hartman-Caverly, Sarah. "Dark Patterns: Surveillance Capitalism and Business Ethics." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2023. https://projectcora.org/assignment/dark-patterns-surveillance-capitalism-and-business-ethics.

Pages