Individual

Submitted by Elisa Acosta on July 2nd, 2017
Short Description: 

This activity was created to introduce first-year students to library resources they can use for their annotated bibliography assignment. In pairs, students are assigned a task card that requires them to find an information source. After finding a source meeting the criteria of their task card, the student teams input their answers into a Google Form. Formative assessment takes place during class, allowing the librarian to modify instruction on-the-spot based on the responses from the form.

Summative assessment takes place at the end of the semester, when a rubric is applied to a sample of student responses from the activity. This assessment provides a more thorough picture of where students may have succeeded or struggled with the activity, and may provide ideas for how to adjust the activity in the future.

This recipe is from The First-Year Experience Cookbook, edited by Raymond Pun and Meggan Houlihan and written by Elisa Slater Acosta and Katherine Donaldson.

Learning Outcomes: 

The student will use information ethically by providing basic citation information for their source.
The student will be able to identify the appropriate information type based on their information need.
The student will be able to properly identify the format of the information source they find.
The student will be able to use effective keywords for their information need.
The student will be able to describe the purpose of a specific information source.
The student will be able to articulate how they could support a social justice argument using a source.
The student will be able to find a relevant source to match their information need.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This activity takes place after the Research Exploration Exercise and before the Annotated Bibliography .

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Acosta, Elisa. "Taste Testing for Two: Using Formative and Summative Assessment." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2017. https://projectcora.org/assignment/taste-testing-two-using-formative-and-summative-assessment.
Submitted by Andrea Brooks on June 20th, 2017
Short Description: 

This resource and accompanying assignment focuses on evaluating news sources/claims and were used in an online information literacy class.

Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to critically evaluate information sources using a number of factors, including the creator’s authority and perspective, the intended audience, the accuracy of the content, the context of the information need, and one's own perspective in interpreting the information

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Setting: Online, 8-week information literacy course. This three-credit course is typically taught as a 16-week semester offering, but was altered for a summer 2017 session. Context: As part of a larger module on evaluating information, students are presented with multiple resources/readings related to news sources, perspective of news sources, fake news/misinformation, and tips for evaluating claims. This particular assignment had students view a Prezi presentation titled Fact Checking Pro and then complete a LibWizard that presented multiple claims related to coffee/caffeine consumption. For each claim, students ranked the quality of the headline’s claim on a sclae of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent), and provided an explanation for their choice. Students also had to describe the steps they took to fact check the claim.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

See provided links

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

It may be beneficial to provide more prompts in the LibWizard to gauge student fact-checking efforts. Some students were very detailed; others were not. Additionally, it would be interesting and maybe more interactive for the students if they could somehow see how their peers had rated the source. I’m not sure how to do this in the LibWizard, but there may be some other way to make this happen. In a face-to-face setting, this would be easier to accomplish

Suggested Citation: 
Brooks, Andrea. "Fact Checking Pro." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2017. https://projectcora.org/assignment/fact-checking-pro-0.
Submitted by Rachel Wen-Paloutzian on May 11th, 2017
Short Description: 

With a wealth of sources, archives offer numerous educational opportunities for students to enhance critical analysis, historical inquiry, and information literacy skills. This workshop demonstrates Research as Inquiry, as it guides students through the steps of initial inquiry with primary sources in archives: basic description, context investigation, and disciplinary questions. The Analyzing Archival Sources Worksheet is adaptable for instruction on physical and digital archives pertaining to local communities and urban development. Additional research assignments are suggested to create a scaffolding learning experience on archival research.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Analyzing Archival Sources Worksheet_Urban Studies.docxdisplayed 891 times15.66 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

• Students gain introduction to research in archives and special collections.
• Students learn about archival collections and how to locate contextual information using collection guides.
• Students engage in hands-on active learning and group discussion with different types of archival materials pertinent to local communities and urban development.
• Students analyze historical documents and evaluate the context of these primary sources.

Discipline: 
Urban Studies

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

In collaboration with Professor Mona Seymour, this library workshop is conducted during an Archives and Special Collections instruction session for Urban Studies 1010: Urban Analysis at Loyola Marymount University. During the workshop, students investigate archival materials pertaining to community and urban development in Los Angeles after the 1992 civil unrest. In groups of two, students investigate a variety of archival materials, such as telephone surveys, urban study reports, and radio program transcripts, documenting economic and social aspects of diverse local communities. Using the archival collection guides, each student group focuses on one primary source document in order to fill out the Analyzing Archival Sources Worksheet. Guided by the Worksheet, students learn to identify key elements of archival sources, explore historical events and contexts in which these primary sources have been created, and consider further inquiry and research.

After students complete the worksheet, the instructor(s) facilitate group discussion with the class. Each student group shares their observation and analysis of a primary source. Students are asked to compare and contrast the different types of historical urban sources. In conclusion, the class would discuss how to incorporate the historical urban sources into their disciplinary research.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

The Analyzing Archival Sources Worksheet can be used for archives and special collections instruction using physical archival materials, and it can also be adapted for reference library instruction using digital archival objects.

Beyond the instruction session, the following research assignments could create a scaffolding learning experience on archival research.

For example:

Students can visit physical or digital archives, locate a historical document of their interests, and fill out the worksheet as their first step of research.

• Short writing assignment: Based on the Worksheet, each student writes an analysis report on their selected primary source materials from archives. Students may choose two or more primary sources in order to evaluate the diverse aspects and perspectives highlighted in each document. They must properly cite their primary sources, indicating the specific collections and archives.

• In-depth research assignment: Based on their initial analysis of a primary source, students come up with their own research topics. Consider the following: How have the urban situations changed between the time of the document’s creation and the present time? Has there been any progress in addressing and implementing change in local communities? Students need to incorporate other primary sources and secondary sources for their research papers.

Suggested Citation: 
Wen-Paloutzian, Rachel. "Local Communities Matter: Analyzing Historical Urban Sources." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2017. https://projectcora.org/assignment/local-communities-matter-analyzing-historical-urban-sources.
Submitted by Jennifer Bankard on April 12th, 2017
Short Description: 

This assignment asks students to find a real Call for Papers and write a 6-8 page researched argument that contributes original ideas to an academic conversation.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
WRIT340 Scholarly Audience Assignment Spring 2016.pdfdisplayed 905 times102.71 KB
AttachmentSize
Literature ReviewAnnotatedBibliography.pdfdisplayed 897 times73.08 KB
Citation Tracking Handout.pdfdisplayed 795 times207.36 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

To introduce undergraduate students to academic discourse at the graduate and professional level.
To consider academic discourse as contextual based on discipline and specific audience (reflected in a Call for Papers).
To explicitly situate an academic argument in a scholarly context, positioning the argument in response to the work of other academics.

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Bankard, Jennifer. "“Who You Gonna Call”…for Papers: The Scholarly Audience Assignment." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2017. https://projectcora.org/assignment/%E2%80%9Cwho-you-gonna-call%E2%80%9D%E2%80%A6-papers-scholarly-audience-assignment.
Submitted by Elisa Acosta on March 20th, 2017
Short Description: 

Students in an introductory Women's and Gender Studies course are required to critically analyze and edit an article in Wikipedia. Through class discussion and an active learning exercise, students begin to understand how and why women and many racial groups and individuals are underrepresented or systematically marginalized in Wikipedia. Students learn how to use the "Talk" tab to evaluate Wikipedia articles and learn about authority and power structures within that community.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Lesson Plandisplayed 1100 times28.96 KB
Worksheet #1 displayed 1041 times14.86 KB
Worksheet #2 displayed 926 times14.79 KB
Worksheet #3 displayed 947 times15.01 KB
Worksheet #1 (short version)displayed 987 times14.48 KB
Worksheet #2 (short version)displayed 1007 times14.42 KB
Worksheet #3 (short version)displayed 902 times14.67 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Identify voices missing or marginalized in Wikipedia Define "notability" Define "reliable sources" Explain how Wikipedia's policies and guidelines contribute to its gender gap in knowledge

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

One-shot library instruction. This exercise is a "warm up" for the Wikipedia edit-a-thon co-sponsored by the Women's and Gender Studies Department. http://librarynews.lmu.edu/2017/03/wikipedia-edit-thon-gender-race-sexua...

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Jackson, J. (2016, July 28). Building on Millions of Tiny Shoulders: Tips for Hosting a Wikipedia Edit-a-thon. [Blog article]. Retrieved from http://programminglibrarian.org/blog/building-millions-tiny-shoulders-ti...

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

If taught Fall Semester, most first year students don't know what peer-review is yet.

Suggested Citation: 
Acosta, Elisa. "The Gender Gap in Wikipedia." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2017. https://projectcora.org/assignment/gender-gap-wikipedia.
Submitted by Carolyn Caffrey on February 15th, 2017
Short Description: 

An introductory lesson to finding and understanding data in social sciences.

Learning Outcomes: 

*Identify appropriate data sources and locate data using disciplinary data repositories
*Recognize that data has value beyond its original purpose including to validate research or reuse by others
*Track a scholarly conversation within sociology through data sources

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This lesson took place in a sociology research methods course (created with Mary-Michelle Moore). Students were familiar with basic database searching techniques and were getting ready to do their own literature reviews on a sociology topic of their choosing followed by some assignments using SPSS to analyze existing data sets.

After a quick review on finding peer-reviewed journal articles, the librarian asks students "Where does data come from?" to talk about data sources.
Then students split into small groups to explore an article and its accompanying data set in Google Forms. (We have access to ICPSR so the questions ask students about an article that uses a dataset from ICPSR but FigShare or freely available sources could also be used).
After students complete the Google form the librarian pulls the class back together to discuss the answers.
The librarian also pulls up the codebook, questionnaire, and talks about the ways different researchers approach the same data set to answer their research questions.

Students struggle most with "what makes a data set trustworthy." They tended to focus on external indicators such as it's used in peer-reviewed articles, funders, and who the authors are. We also tried to emphasize the quality of the data itself as an indicator (completeness, sample size, questions asked, documentation, etc.).

Then students search for data sets on their research topics as well as other peer-reviewed articles through citation chaining in ICPSR.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

"Good Data Examples" from Love Your Data Week were provided as supplemental reading in the learning management system

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

It can be adapted for other disciplines that use data sets.

Students struggle most with the question, "What makes this data set trustworthy," so we provided some followup up resources on analyzing data sets to the class through the learning management system.

Suggested Citation: 
Caffrey, Carolyn . "Where does data come from?." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2017. https://projectcora.org/assignment/where-does-data-come.
Submitted by Aisha Conner-Gaten on February 9th, 2017
Short Description: 

This instructional session coincided with a project comparing data from two cities for an Urban Studies 1000 level (Freshmen) course. The session provided a basic overview of Simply Map as a web-based application, described the data available within and its origins (Census, American Community Survey, etc.), two activities for creating and visualizing the data, and supporting materials for understanding the data including a libguide and deliverable handout.

Learning Outcomes: 

User will be able to: -To create a map using variable data in SimplyMap -To create a standard report using variable data in SimplyMap -To create a ring study using variable data in SimplyMap -Develop relationships between variable data in SimplyMap

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This session was conducted before the announcement of the course project that specifically calls for students to create SimplyMap reports to compare data across multiple locations for the Urban Studies course. Data found in SimplyMap can be used by students as maps, charts, and tables on a poster project to be completed at the semester's end.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Ensure that all users have SimplyMap access before the session begins. SimplyMap does have a user threshold for simultaneous access so contact the company to ensure enough seats for your session.

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Conner-Gaten, Aisha. "Simply Map: Visualizing Census and Survey Data." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2017. https://projectcora.org/assignment/simply-map-visualizing-census-and-survey-data.
Submitted by Sarah Vital on January 27th, 2017
Short Description: 

A 90 minute session with first year students in the School of Economics and Business Administration. Covered areas included overview of difficulties in searching and algorithm bias. Emphasis was on the importance to being critical consumers of information and understanding searches are not neutral.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
SEBAFYACLessonPlan2016.docxdisplayed 1046 times12.33 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students are aware of the “algorithm bias” that is inherent in the technology of search engines (all search engines, from Google to library databases) and how this affects their search for information (and the concerns this bias has for social justice). Students understand ways to overcome this bias by 1) critically evaluating not just the individual resources found but also the search results in general , 2) using multiple resources for information retrieval, and 3) making use of experts and known, reliable sources

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This was a session for the required First Year Experience .25 credit course. All students have majors declared in Business Administration (including Marketing and Finance), Economics, or Accounting

Suggested Citation: 
Vital, Sarah. "Social Justice in Information- First Year Business Students." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2017. https://projectcora.org/assignment/social-justice-information-first-year-business-students.
Submitted by Elisa Acosta on January 25th, 2017
Short Description: 

In an effort to provide students with an open space to learn about and discuss recent national concerns over “fake news,” the library offered four sessions of the workshop “Keepin’ It Real: Tips & Strategies for Evaluating Fake News” during a campus-wide Inauguration Teach-In on Friday, January 20, 2017. During this session, students had the opportunity to talk about how misleading news sources (encompassing misinformation, disinformation, click-bait, propaganda, etc.) have affected their views on civil discourse, specifically relating to the recent U.S. presidential election. By the end of the session, we hope students became more confident in their ability to use critical thinking skills to judge the reliability of news reports, whether they come via print, television or the internet.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Lesson Plan displayed 4598 times612.04 KB
AttachmentSize
Activity #1displayed 4003 times143.59 KB
PowerPointdisplayed 2799 times496.98 KB
Handout / Activity #2displayed 3198 times185.37 KB
Handout / Activity #2displayed 3180 times126.82 KB
Activity #2 Answer Key / Additional Instructions displayed 3798 times15.7 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

• Students will practice techniques for evaluating the credibility of news stories.
• Students will reflect upon their reactions to stories and practice identifying and distinguishing between their emotional responses and logical analyses of the items.
• Students will learn the value of information and sources from multiple perspectives.
• Students will become credible, trustworthy publishers in the digital age (sharing news).

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

The campus-wide breakout sessions were from 11:00-12:30pm (1.5 hours). Faculty were encouraged to cancel classes 8am-12:30pm so that students could watch the Inauguration together and attend one breakout session.

• Inauguration Day Teach-in website:  https://web.archive.org/web/20180117195647/http://academics.lmu.edu/teachin/breakoutsessions/

The library decided to offer four 45-minute break out sessions. Approximately 90 students attended. Several staff members and faculty attended also.

• Library Breakout Session Description: 

https://web.archive.org/web/20170113072807/https://librarynews.lmu.edu/2017/01/keepin-real-tips-strategies-evaluating-fake-news/

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Activity #2 could be spun off into a reflective assignment for students to critically examine their own news media consumption and information behaviors.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

We had too much material for a 45-minute workshop. Perhaps 60-90 minutes is more realistic. Set aside more time for student discussion. As time marches on, choose a more timely "Fake News" story for Activity #1.

Suggested Citation: 
Acosta, Elisa. "Keepin It Real: Tips and Strategies for Evaluating Fake News." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2017. https://projectcora.org/assignment/keepin-it-real-tips-and-strategies-evaluating-fake-news.
Submitted by Cristy Moran on January 19th, 2017
Short Description: 

Students will generate a well-reasoned conclusion in a two-page paper in which they identify a "good" Internet source and a "bad" Internet source, using IL source evaluation terminology (outlined in CRAAP) to guide their writing.

They will then explain why the good source should be used to investigate the chosen topic, and why the bad source should not be used in their investigation.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Cristy_Moran_ClimateChangeCHM.docxdisplayed 1323 times14.96 KB
Evaluating Internet Sources Rubric.docxdisplayed 1226 times18.66 KB
AttachmentSize
Cristy_Moran_CRAAP_handout.pdfdisplayed 1978 times668.5 KB
Cristy_Moran_Intellectual_Standards_handout.docxdisplayed 1001 times15.77 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

• Student will critically assesses sources using various criteria terminology such as: currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose, etc., and adequately examines each source.
• Student will identify various specific authority factors for each source such as: domain, URL, corporate author, “About Us” or “Contact Us” links; or author credentials.
• Student will clearly state reliability and appropriateness of the information for the specific information/ research need, and demonstrate adequate reasoning and/or justification for assessing each source.
• Student will articulate and apply the Intellectual Standards to guide reasoning.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This lesson was created by a Chemistry professor for his Honors college Chemistry course. It has been enhanced for IL and adapted for our college's QEP (theme: critical thinking). It was also adapted throughout attending a Backwards Design class as an example (Library Juice Academy) thus the GRASPS instructional design tool was used.

Content will be uploaded into their online course shell (in the course management system) for them to view prior to an in-person library session. This will include a short library orientation video and another short using library resources video – both of which I created in the last year.

Students will attend a face-to-face library session – a full 75-minute class.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

For additional information about the Intellectual Standards, please visit www.criticalthinking.org for the Paul-Elder Critical Thinking Model.

Assessment or Criteria for Success
(e.g. rubric, guidelines, exemplary sample paper, etc.): 
AttachmentSize
Cristy_Moran_ClimateChangewAnswers.docxdisplayed 926 times21.27 KB
Suggested Citation: 
Moran, Cristy. "Evaluating Internet Sources - Climate Change." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2017. https://projectcora.org/assignment/evaluating-internet-sources-climate-change.

Pages