Undergraduate / Bachelors

Submitted by Candice Benjes-Small on November 17th, 2016
Short Description: 

As people rely more and more on social media to get their news, the filter bubble becomes increasingly problematic. In this workshop, students learn how to evaluate whether a news site is reliable. This group activity takes about 30 minutes and can be used for many different audiences by adjusting the examples used.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Evaluating news worksheet.docxdisplayed 13399 times16.96 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

• Students will be able to identify characteristics of credible news sources. • Students will critically examine news sources to determine credibility.

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

The workshop opened with an ice breaker, having students brainstorm three things they look for when deciding whether a news Website is believable. They did a quick pair-and-share, and then I recorded what they said on the white board. Next, I broke them into teams of two and asked each to look at two Websites and complete a worksheet. In our lesson, Source A was a Reuters news article and Source B was a Bipartisan Report article. Both are on the same story, although Source A correctly identifies it as happening in January 2016 while B plays it as if it just happened (October 2016). The worksheet included questions which showed similarities as well as differences. It took about 15-20 minutes for the students to complete the worksheets; then we discussed the answers. Talking points: Source A is a Reuters news report, while Source B is from a muckraking site. Both are on the same story, although Source A correctly identifies it as happening in January 2016 while B plays it as if it just happened (published Oct 2016). Discuss which criteria made a difference in judging the credibility- and which weren’t important- notably, the domain name, the advertising presence,a nd the date were not significant. Note that it’s best when the reporter has done the reporting themselves, not just repeating other media outlets’ reports. Would people on the left be more willing to believe the bipartisan report because it fits into their worldview? We need to be careful to avoid confirmation bias: believing a source is legit because we want to believe what it says. Opinion journalism is a good and valuable resource but it’s different from NEWS. With opinion journalism, you need to verify the facts in the story. In opinion pieces, they are making an argument and you need to analyze it. After the discussion, I had students brainstorm three criteria they would now use to evaluate a news source. They shared out, and then I collected them for a quick assessment later.

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Teaching Tips: After pairing up the students, have one look at Source A, while the other looks at Source B, and then compare the two to answer the worksheet questions. To find other sample articles, check out http://mediabiasfactcheck.com and Melissa Zimdars's list of unreliable news sites: http://tinyurl.com/j9tldck Potential Pitfalls: When selecting an article, choose one that is controversial but not inflammatory to your audience

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Benjes-Small, Candice. "Evaluating news sites: Credible or Clickbait?." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2016. https://projectcora.org/assignment/evaluating-news-sites-credible-or-clickbait.
Submitted by Jacob Berg on November 4th, 2016
Short Description: 

There is a large body of research on corporate ownership and control of traditional media, such as print, television, and radio. Comparatively, research about corporate control of what we see online is underdeveloped, yet search engines are often the first place students uncritically look for research as opposed to the library website, catalogs, and discovery services. Dr. Safiya Noble shows that Google image searches for black women often perpetuate and reinforce dominant narratives involving racism and misogyny. As Google is often seen as neutral, such search results are presented as “natural,” the way things are, when in fact they are the products of capitalism, hegemonic patriarchy, and white supremacy. Interrogating results such as these is one goal of this lesson plan, along with getting students to think critically about, to problematize, the everyday tools used in the research process and to explore links between capitalism and racism, misogyny, and homophobia.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
vol2_chapter 11.pdfdisplayed 2159 times295.04 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Articulate clearly how algorithms such as PageRank influence information-seeking behavior and search results. Explain Google’s data security and privacy issues. Create searches that show critical thinking and awareness of how Google works.

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Berg, Jacob. "Googling Google: Search Engines as Market Actors ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2016. https://projectcora.org/assignment/googling-google-search-engines-market-actors.
Submitted by Ryer Banta on November 2nd, 2016
Short Description: 

This lesson introduces undergraduates to personal digital archiving (PDA) as an instructional bridge to research data management. PDA is the study of how people organize, maintain, use and share personal digital information in their daily lives. PDA skills closely parallel research data management skills, with the added benefit of being directly relevant to undergraduate students, most of whom manage complex personal digital content on a daily basis. By teaching PDA, librarians encourage authentic learning experiences that immediately resonate with students' day-to-day activities. Teaching PDA builds a foundation of knowledge that not only helps students manage their personal digital materials, but can be translated into research data management skills that will enhance students' academic and professional careers. This lesson was developed by Sara Mannheimer and Ryer Banta and is licensed CC-BY 4.0.

Learning Outcomes: 

Students will apply file naming conventions, folder structure and other data management standards to their own digital files. Students will explain the significance and impact of data management, and lack thereof, for personal, school and work digital files.

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Initially this was developed for face to face course, but has also been used for online classes.

Suggested Citation: 
Banta, Ryer. "Everyday Data Management." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2016. https://projectcora.org/assignment/everyday-data-management.
Submitted by Carolyn Caffrey on August 25th, 2016
Short Description: 

This group activity can be used in a variety of disciplines and contexts. Pass the Problem aims to have students provide feedback to other students on database and keyword selection. By having students critique each other it works to build critical self-reflection during the research process (it's also pretty fun!).

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Pass the Problem.docxdisplayed 4511 times24.33 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Strategically select a database appropriate for their research topics Brainstorm keywords appropriate to a given research topic Evaluate the effectiveness of searching language

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This activity was part of a larger class session focused on preparing students for their interdisciplinary research projects. At this point in the semester students did not yet have their own research topics. It also took place outside of a computer classroom where not all students had laptops. Students break up into groups of 3-4 students. You can make as many topics as you want. For a class of 25 I created 4 topic options. Each group receives 5-10 minutes to complete each segment. When the timer is up they switch with a group. No one should receive the paper they start with until the very end. At the end of the activity we come back as a class and discuss how it went and what strategies they might implement in their own research processes. (I first heard about the idea of passing a problem in an interactive way from Sarah Lucchesi and Jenn Sams from Michigan Tech at Lake Superior Libraries Symposium, this is inspired by their idea.)

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Tips: Activity works well when paired with additional content. You can mix up the questions or add more. Pitfall: Choosing approachable topics with lots of keywords options. It can be hard to have students easily trade papers in classrooms set up with rows, you may need to facilitate the passing.

Suggested Citation: 
Caffrey, Carolyn . "Pass the Problem." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2016. https://projectcora.org/assignment/pass-problem.
Submitted by Deborah Novak on July 12th, 2016
Short Description: 

This assignment was created for an introductory nutrition course for health related science majors and nonmajors to meet the Information Literacy Flag criteria for the core standards at Loyola Marymount University. The assignment focuses on the evaluation of a primary and secondary source on a specific topic to assess the similarities and differences between the sources of information. The primary goal of the assignment is for a pair of students to select a current popular press article that references a recent scientific journal article. The students then procure a copy of the scientific journal article. Using a formatted questionnaire, the students evaluate characteristics and information from the popular press article and then characteristics and information from the journal article, then compare and contrast the two information sources.

Learning Outcomes: 

Locate, evaluate and effectively utilize information obtained from a variety of information sources. Find and use scholarly and discipline-specific professional information and understand how it differs from popular information. Evaluate resources for reliability, validity, accuracy, authority, and bias.

Discipline: 
BiologyHealth

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This assignment is incorporated into an introductory nutrition course for health-related science majors and nonmajors. Most nutrition courses include a discussion on scientific research methods and sources of reliable nutrition information. This project has been integrated into the course as the follow-up assignment to the Scientific Method and Reliable Sources of Nutrition Information Unit. The assignment is designed to be completed by students partnered together in groups of two (three when there is an odd number of students in the class).

Assessment or Criteria for Success
(e.g. rubric, guidelines, exemplary sample paper, etc.): 
AttachmentSize
The Partner Evaluation Form: allows each student to evaluate their project partner's contributions to the assignment.displayed 757 times15.92 KB
Sample Popular Press Articledisplayed 666 times16.93 KB
Sample Scientific Journal Articles referenced in popular press articledisplayed 1027 times189.18 KB
Sample completed ILP Questionnaire (exemplary sample)displayed 2634 times253.47 KB
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

This assignment does not work well if the popular press article is a "list" i.e. top 5 sources of fiber, or the journal article is a opinion or summary piece. The journal article should be a standard analytical, descriptive or experimental study. Instructor needs to carefully review the popular press article and scientific article to make sure the students have selected proper articles. About 10-15% of the class need 2-3 tries before identifying an appropriate set of articles. The due date for Part 2 is usually determined after all of the groups have successfully identified their sources. The project can be done individually but it can be time consuming to grade which is why it has become a partner project. The partner evaluation rubric provides accountability for level of participation of each partner.

Suggested Citation: 
Novak, Deborah. "Information Literacy Project." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2016. https://projectcora.org/assignment/information-literacy-project.
Submitted by Steve Gerstle on July 12th, 2016
Short Description: 

Using ProQuest SIRS Issues Researcher or similar database, groups of students work together to find and read four informative magazine articles representing a variety of opinions on a topic. For each magazine article they write an MLA citation. In an oral presentation of less than three minutes per group, they summarize the controversy without giving their own opinions and explain why they chose the four articles. Students are told to be prepared to answer questions about their topic and why they selected each of the four articles. Students are given basic instruction on writing an MLA citation and using a database.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
SIRSTopicsBlank.docxdisplayed 1528 times14.58 KB
ESL 52A SIRS Assignment.docxdisplayed 1727 times16.57 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Develop successful search strategies appropriate for specific tools. Locate, evaluate, synthesize, organize and present credible information that fulfills the identified information need.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

Can be adapted for higher level ESL classes.

Assessment or Criteria for Success
(e.g. rubric, guidelines, exemplary sample paper, etc.): 
AttachmentSize
ESL 52 Assessment.docxdisplayed 1124 times14.22 KB
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Students tend to summarize the articles rather than the controversy. Also, students tend to want to give their own opinions. It is important to stress that they are to summarize the controversy and different perspectives. I sometimes have them think of it as a work assignment. The boss is a very busy person and wants you to research the topic and provide an executive summary. It is a challenging assignment, but I have found that the students rise to the challenge.

Suggested Citation: 
Gerstle, Steve. "Summarizing different perspectives on a controversial topic." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2016. https://projectcora.org/assignment/summarizing-different-perspectives-controversial-topic.
Submitted by Nicole Branch on April 18th, 2016
Short Description: 

Students will learn to identify where they might find school and community data; practice accessing this data; and create a school community data profile. Students will also be introduced to some of the problems of bias when looking at school and community data. For part one, student will find data for the high school they attended and the community they grew up in. In part two, students will collect the same data for a school in the community they will be working in over the course of the quarter.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
FindingDataforSelfCommunitySociety-Part_1.pdfdisplayed 1344 times405.79 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Identify and navigate sources for data/statistics about schools and communities (Frame: Searching as strategic exploration) Construct a school & community profile using data and statistics (Frame: Information has value) Critically analyze data/statistics and the presentation of data/statistics in the context of community service (Frame: Authority is constructed & contextual)

Discipline: 
EducationSociology

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This plan was designed for the course Sociology 30, Self, Community & Society with a focus on education. In addition to their coursework, students are placed in community based organizations where they provided service for one quarter. This is part one of a three part series. The plan is designed for use in higher education settings and is aligned with the Framework for Information Literacy in Higher Education.

Suggested Citation: 
Branch, Nicole. "Finding Data for Self, Community & Society- Part 1." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2016. https://projectcora.org/assignment/finding-data-self-community-society-part-1.
Submitted by Cristy Moran on April 6th, 2016
Short Description: 

Students write to communicate and their writing, when citing sources, must communicate what they understand of others’ writings. By asking students to write with the purpose of summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting a selected article to their classmate, they will experience what you experience when you read their writing. They will understand the purpose and mechanics of using sources in their writing. Activity is highly adaptable and suitable for independent readers high school and above. Activity can be modified for lower level learners. Additionally, .doc and .pdf versions of worksheets are attached so instructors can feel free to alter. Activity steps: * Distribute Source Notes worksheet to students. * Give students 10 min to re-read their source and to complete one summarize/ paraphrase/ quote exercise. * Students will exchange Source Notes with partner (Student B). * Without consulting Student A, Student B will tell the class what they understand about Student A’s topic. * Student A will self-assess, answering what they could have done better to communicate in writing. (Example sources are provided as PDF if students' actual sources are unavailable. Instructors are free to use their own example sources - those provided are included for inspiration or adoption.)

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Source Notes_directions+worksheet.docxdisplayed 1197 times21.75 KB
SourceNotes_worksheetONLY.docxdisplayed 985 times14.92 KB
SourceNotes_worksheetONLY.pdfdisplayed 1230 times92.69 KB
SourceNotesActivitySlides.pdfdisplayed 1240 times19.77 KB
Example IL Excerpt 1.pdfdisplayed 1732 times102.2 KB
Example IL Excerpt 2.pdfdisplayed 1081 times83.2 KB
AttachmentSize
Source Notes_directions+worksheet.docxdisplayed 791 times21.75 KB
SourceNotes_worksheetONLY.docxdisplayed 883 times14.92 KB
SourceNotes_worksheetONLY.pdfdisplayed 1042 times92.69 KB
SourceNotesActivitySlides.pdfdisplayed 1070 times19.77 KB
Example IL Excerpt 1.pdfdisplayed 987 times102.2 KB
Example IL Excerpt 2.pdfdisplayed 929 times83.2 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will practice critical reading & note-taking with research materials relevant to their immediate need (i.e. their assignment). Students will share their notes with a partner who will present to class – and assess their own effectiveness in communicating ideas in writing.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This activity has been shared and modeled for non-librarian and librarian instructors. The materials can be used in support of a real assigned research project/ paper or with example sources. We encourage the use of actual student research materials to be used in the classroom portion of this activity so students can continue use beyond the interactive exercise. It is not recommended that this activity be implemented during a one-shot library instruction session due to the length of time required. It can, however, be introduced in a one-shot library instruction session. Materials used for this can also be distributed to academic support partners including but not limited to composition faculty, writing centers/ labs, tutors, reference areas, or other front line staff who students engage with questions about research or writing.

Suggested Citation: 
Moran, Cristy. "Source Notes ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2016. https://projectcora.org/assignment/source-notes.
Submitted by Dennis Isbell on April 1st, 2016
Short Description: 

A brief two page handout on how to read abstracts for scholarly journals for lower division undergraduates in particular. Examples include one from social sciences and one from humanities.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Scholarly Journal Abs Handout1-16Rev.docxdisplayed 1587 times56.9 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Evaluating Sources

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

First-year composition classes. Introduced when students were searching then selecting scholarly journal articles for their research paper assignments.

Suggested Citation: 
Isbell, Dennis. "Making Sense of Scholarly Journal Abstracts." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2016. https://projectcora.org/assignment/making-sense-scholarly-journal-abstracts.
Submitted by Ryne Leuzinger on March 13th, 2016
Short Description: 

This workshop provides an introduction to creating infographics using Piktochart and includes advice on selecting a design, incorporating data, and structuring a story.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Infographics Workshop.docxdisplayed 1049 times325.84 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

1. Participants will view and critique examples of infographics, in order to gain exposure to best practices in infographic design. 2. Participants will utilize the basic features of Piktochart, in order to gain experience employing best practices in infographic design.

Discipline: 
Multidisciplinary

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This workshop was created as an offering of the Savvy Researcher workshop series at the University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign [http://www.library.illinois.edu/sc/services/savvy_researcher.html]

Suggested Citation: 
Leuzinger, Ryne. "Infographics Workshop." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2016. https://projectcora.org/assignment/infographics-workshop.

Pages